Comparison of the effect of surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on the microbial load and surgical site infection in laparotomy patients: A randomised controlled trial

Background: Surgical site skin preparation is essential for reducing the skin’s microbial load and preventing surgical site infection (SSI). Considering the importance of determining the effect of temperature on the antimicrobial property of povidone-iodine antiseptic, this study investigated the effect of povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on microbial load and incidence of SSI in laparotomy patients. Method: This study was a single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial conducted from April to July 2024 at two selected hospitals in Tehran (registration number: IRCT20240212060966N1). Laparotomy patients (N = 126) were randomly assigned to the control group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 22°C) and the intervention group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 35°C). The skin preparation was done in two stages (primary and secondary preparation). Both groups received the same primary preparation (7.5% povidone-iodine). Culture samples were collected before skin preparation, after the primary preparation and after the secondary preparation. A researcher-made checklist was also used to investigate the incidence of SSIs within 24 hours and 30 days after surgery. The data was analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The microbial load after secondary skin preparation was significantly reduced in both the control (p = 0.001) and intervention (p=0.003) groups. However, there was no significant difference in microbial load before and after secondary skin preparation between the two groups (p = 0.437). The difference in SSI incidence between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.164). Conclusion: Since there were no significant differences in microbial load and SSI between the two groups, it is recommended that povidone-iodine be used at room temperature for skin preparation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perioperative Nursing
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1358
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the effect of surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on the microbial load and surgical site infection in laparotomy patients: A randomised controlled trial

Fardin Amiri, Sedigheh Hannani, Mojgan Oshaghi, Nemamali Azadi et al.
1 links
Journal of Perioperative Nursing
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Comparison of the effect of surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on the microbial load and surgical site infection in laparotomy patients: A randomised controlled trial

Fardin Amiri, Sedigheh Hannani, Mojgan Oshaghi, Nemamali Azadi, Diba Nikkhah Dashtizadeh
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgical site skin preparation is essential for reducing the skin’s microbial load and preventing surgical site infection (SSI). Considering the importance of determining the effect of temperature on the antimicrobial property of povidone-iodine antiseptic, this study investigated the effect of povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on microbial load and incidence of SSI in laparotomy patients. Method: This study was a single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial conducted from April to July 2024 at two selected hospitals in Tehran (registration number: IRCT20240212060966N1). Laparotomy patients (N = 126) were randomly assigned to the control group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 22°C) and the intervention group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 35°C). The skin preparation was done in two stages (primary and secondary preparation). Both groups received the same primary preparation (7.5% povidone-iodine). Culture samples were collected before skin preparation, after the primary preparation and after the secondary preparation. A researcher-made checklist was also used to investigate the incidence of SSIs within 24 hours and 30 days after surgery. The data was analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The microbial load after secondary skin preparation was significantly reduced in both the control (p = 0.001) and intervention (p=0.003) groups. However, there was no significant difference in microbial load before and after secondary skin preparation between the two groups (p = 0.437). The difference in SSI incidence between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.164). Conclusion: Since there were no significant differences in microbial load and SSI between the two groups, it is recommended that povidone-iodine be used at room temperature for skin preparation.

Journal of Perioperative NursingVol. 37(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.