Fake reviews in the ‘here and now’: Psychological distance and falsified online reviews

Abstract There is a growing popularity of consumer reviews on online platforms that is attached to an increase in the pervasiveness of falsified online reviews. The key aim of this study is to provide insights into how falsified online reviews are created by exploring the perceptions of the psychological distance of the creators of falsified reviews. We conducted 48 in‐depth interviews with online reviewers who were actively engaged in reviewing food and beverage serving outlets. We investigated four dimensions of psychological distance (spatial, temporal, social, and hypothetical) and how they are linked to the valence of the review. Our findings illustrate that the way online reviewers cognitively process the psychological distance between themselves and the target of their review shapes how falsified online reviews are created. We also provide an inventory of propositions regarding how individuals' psychological distance from their subject relates to the valance of falsified online reviews. We conclude with a discussion of contributions and implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Management Review
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70000
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fake reviews in the ‘here and now’: Psychological distance and falsified online reviews

Lloyd C. Harris, Dogá Istanbulluoglu
2 citations
European Management Review
Digital Marketing and Social Media
8.40
article

Fake reviews in the ‘here and now’: Psychological distance and falsified online reviews

Lloyd C. Harris, Dogá Istanbulluoglu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is a growing popularity of consumer reviews on online platforms that is attached to an increase in the pervasiveness of falsified online reviews. The key aim of this study is to provide insights into how falsified online reviews are created by exploring the perceptions of the psychological distance of the creators of falsified reviews. We conducted 48 in‐depth interviews with online reviewers who were actively engaged in reviewing food and beverage serving outlets. We investigated four dimensions of psychological distance (spatial, temporal, social, and hypothetical) and how they are linked to the valence of the review. Our findings illustrate that the way online reviewers cognitively process the psychological distance between themselves and the target of their review shapes how falsified online reviews are created. We also provide an inventory of propositions regarding how individuals' psychological distance from their subject relates to the valance of falsified online reviews. We conclude with a discussion of contributions and implications.

European Management ReviewVol. 22(4)
University of Manchester (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fake reviews in the ‘here and now’: Psychological distance and falsified online reviews — Lloyd C. Harris, Dogá Istanbulluoglu · European Management Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS