Investigating incident under-reporting in aviation: Qualitative insights among Greek pilots

Developing a robust reporting culture is essential in aviation as it facilitates proactive accident prevention. Although pilots' attitudes towards incident reporting have attracted international research interest, similar research in Greece—a member state of ICAO and EASA—remains very limited, leaving the operational, regulatory, and cultural factors influencing Greek pilots' reporting practices largely unexplored. This research utilized qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews ( N = 18) with military, commercial and general aviation pilots operating in Greece, to explore their views and attitudes towards incident reporting. A detailed representation of the participants' views was facilitated through Thematic Analysis and certain characteristics of Content analysis based on their narratives. The findings of this study aligned with previous research as fear of blame, stigmatization and career progression concerns were among the most substantial barriers to incident reporting, emphasizing that the under-reporting issue persists. Novel insights included the tendency of participants deriving from the commercial sector to be more willing to report safety events, as a result of their aircraft being fitted with a flight data monitoring device. Additionally, participants viewed high reporting frequency as a practice that could draw organizational attention to them and was therefore perceived as a deterrent. Differences between military, commercial and general aviation participants were minimal, indicating a common attitude towards reporting in all three sectors. Recommendations from participants emphasized fostering a just culture over a blame-centric one, advocating for a trustworthy reporting system where fear of punishment does not deter reporting, and where valuable outcomes are shared to boost motivation and strengthen their reporting culture. It is envisaged that enhanced safety-related education should be fostered among pilots, managers and top executive leadership with special focus on the value of incident reporting so as to maximize the benefits of such systems and minimize under-reporting. • Fear of blame and career progression were the most substantial barriers to the surveyed participants. • The presence of Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) equipment seems to facilitate incident reporting of commercial pilots. • High reporting frequency (regular reporting) was reportedly avoided by participating pilots. • Minimal differences were observed between military, commercial and general aviation pilots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Transportation Business & Management
Published
2025-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101309
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating incident under-reporting in aviation: Qualitative insights among Greek pilots

Vassilios Nikolaidis, Ilias Makris, Panagiotis Kioulepoglou, Katerina M. David
Research in Transportation Business & Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Investigating incident under-reporting in aviation: Qualitative insights among Greek pilots

Vassilios Nikolaidis, Ilias Makris, Panagiotis Kioulepoglou, Katerina M. David
article en

Abstract

Developing a robust reporting culture is essential in aviation as it facilitates proactive accident prevention. Although pilots' attitudes towards incident reporting have attracted international research interest, similar research in Greece—a member state of ICAO and EASA—remains very limited, leaving the operational, regulatory, and cultural factors influencing Greek pilots' reporting practices largely unexplored. This research utilized qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews ( N = 18) with military, commercial and general aviation pilots operating in Greece, to explore their views and attitudes towards incident reporting. A detailed representation of the participants' views was facilitated through Thematic Analysis and certain characteristics of Content analysis based on their narratives. The findings of this study aligned with previous research as fear of blame, stigmatization and career progression concerns were among the most substantial barriers to incident reporting, emphasizing that the under-reporting issue persists. Novel insights included the tendency of participants deriving from the commercial sector to be more willing to report safety events, as a result of their aircraft being fitted with a flight data monitoring device. Additionally, participants viewed high reporting frequency as a practice that could draw organizational attention to them and was therefore perceived as a deterrent. Differences between military, commercial and general aviation participants were minimal, indicating a common attitude towards reporting in all three sectors. Recommendations from participants emphasized fostering a just culture over a blame-centric one, advocating for a trustworthy reporting system where fear of punishment does not deter reporting, and where valuable outcomes are shared to boost motivation and strengthen their reporting culture. It is envisaged that enhanced safety-related education should be fostered among pilots, managers and top executive leadership with special focus on the value of incident reporting so as to maximize the benefits of such systems and minimize under-reporting. • Fear of blame and career progression were the most substantial barriers to the surveyed participants. • The presence of Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) equipment seems to facilitate incident reporting of commercial pilots. • High reporting frequency (regular reporting) was reportedly avoided by participating pilots. • Minimal differences were observed between military, commercial and general aviation pilots.

Research in Transportation Business & ManagementVol. 59
University of Peloponnese (GR), Hellenic Air Force (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.