Characterisation (and mischaracterisation) of occupational injuries in portuguese jurisprudence. An analysis from 2011 to 2021

Based on Portuguese case law, this study examined the characterisation and mischaracterisation of occupational injuries in the Portuguese court system. A content analysis was carried out, namely on how the Portuguese courts understand the characterisation and mischaracterisation (requirements) of occupational injury sentences. Case law was collected and analysed from listed decisions by the higher courts (Supreme Court of Justice and the Portuguese Courts of Appeal), between 2011 and 2021. A total of 330 judicial decisions were identified and analysed; groups of descriptors were categorised and sub-themes were identified. The sub-theme 'concept and scope of the injury' was identified in 80 decisions and 'mischaracterisation of injuries' in 46 decisions. This analysis reflects the Portuguese courts' understanding of the extent to which occupational injuries are characterised, which will be important to safeguard the system of compensation for occupational injuries in Portugal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2024.27.04.06
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterisation (and mischaracterisation) of occupational injuries in portuguese jurisprudence. An analysis from 2011 to 2021

António Almeida, Glória Rebelo
Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Characterisation (and mischaracterisation) of occupational injuries in portuguese jurisprudence. An analysis from 2011 to 2021

António Almeida, Glória Rebelo
article en

Abstract

Based on Portuguese case law, this study examined the characterisation and mischaracterisation of occupational injuries in the Portuguese court system. A content analysis was carried out, namely on how the Portuguese courts understand the characterisation and mischaracterisation (requirements) of occupational injury sentences. Case law was collected and analysed from listed decisions by the higher courts (Supreme Court of Justice and the Portuguese Courts of Appeal), between 2011 and 2021. A total of 330 judicial decisions were identified and analysed; groups of descriptors were categorised and sub-themes were identified. The sub-theme 'concept and scope of the injury' was identified in 80 decisions and 'mischaracterisation of injuries' in 46 decisions. This analysis reflects the Portuguese courts' understanding of the extent to which occupational injuries are characterised, which will be important to safeguard the system of compensation for occupational injuries in Portugal.

Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos LaboralesVol. 27(4)
Universidade Europeia (PT), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.