Mechanistic and multi-parametric insights into preserving nutritional, bioactive, and flavor attributes of daylily (Hemerocallis citrina): A comparative evaluation of freeze-drying, hot-air drying, and sun drying

This study offers a comparative evaluation of freeze-drying (FD), hot-air drying (HD), and traditional sun drying (SD) on the physicochemical properties of Hemerocallis citrina Baroni cultivars, aiming to address a critical gap in postharvest processing optimization. By systematically assessing multiple quality parameters—nutritional composition, bioactive compound retention, antioxidant capacity, and flavor profiles—this work highlights the distinct benefits of each drying technique. FD preserved thermolabile compounds most effectively across both cultivars, maintaining significantly higher levels of essential nutrients (total sugars, soluble proteins, ascorbic acid) and bioactive compounds. In MLHH, FD retained superior levels of polyphenols (5.58 mg/g), flavonoids (1.72 mg/g), and carotenoids (54.70 μg/g) compared to HD (4.80, 1.28, 11.62 mg/g) and SD (3.10, 0.49, 7.45 mg/g). XHH showed even higher retention under FD for these compounds, with polyphenols reaching 7.15 mg/g and flavonoids at 2.37 mg/g. These enhanced bioactive contents corresponded to superior antioxidant activity, particularly in XHH where FD achieved 84.60% ABTS radical scavenging compared to HD (43.18%) and SD (76.44%). While SD demonstrated superior flavor development, yielding the highest volatile compound content in XHH (69.01 mg/kg vs. FD: 16.02, HD: 15.84 mg/kg), HD showed selective advantages in mineral retention, particularly for calcium in MLHH (HD: 4025 mg/g, FD: 3537 mg/g, SD: 3225 mg/g). This comprehensive analysis thus establishes evidence-based guidelines for tailoring drying protocols according to specific quality requirements, facilitating targeted approaches in functional food development and nutraceutical manufacturing. • Evaluated freeze-drying (FD), hot-air drying (HD), and sun drying (SD) on Hemerocallis citrina. • FD preserved the highest levels of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidants. • SD retained a diverse flavor profile with 36–37 volatile compounds. • HD effectively preserved potassium and calcium but reduced thermolabile nutrients. • Findings guide tailored drying methods for optimized food and nutraceutical quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LWT
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117510
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Biological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
57.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic and multi-parametric insights into preserving nutritional, bioactive, and flavor attributes of daylily (Hemerocallis citrina): A comparative evaluation of freeze-drying, hot-air drying, and sun drying

Yuwen Mu, Tiandi Zhu, Bo‐Bo Zhang, Chaozhen Zeng et al.
12 citations
LWT
Agriculture and Biological Studies
57.99
article

Mechanistic and multi-parametric insights into preserving nutritional, bioactive, and flavor attributes of daylily (Hemerocallis citrina): A comparative evaluation of freeze-drying, hot-air drying, and sun drying

Yuwen Mu, Tiandi Zhu, Bo‐Bo Zhang, Chaozhen Zeng, Shenghai Hu
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This study offers a comparative evaluation of freeze-drying (FD), hot-air drying (HD), and traditional sun drying (SD) on the physicochemical properties of Hemerocallis citrina Baroni cultivars, aiming to address a critical gap in postharvest processing optimization. By systematically assessing multiple quality parameters—nutritional composition, bioactive compound retention, antioxidant capacity, and flavor profiles—this work highlights the distinct benefits of each drying technique. FD preserved thermolabile compounds most effectively across both cultivars, maintaining significantly higher levels of essential nutrients (total sugars, soluble proteins, ascorbic acid) and bioactive compounds. In MLHH, FD retained superior levels of polyphenols (5.58 mg/g), flavonoids (1.72 mg/g), and carotenoids (54.70 μg/g) compared to HD (4.80, 1.28, 11.62 mg/g) and SD (3.10, 0.49, 7.45 mg/g). XHH showed even higher retention under FD for these compounds, with polyphenols reaching 7.15 mg/g and flavonoids at 2.37 mg/g. These enhanced bioactive contents corresponded to superior antioxidant activity, particularly in XHH where FD achieved 84.60% ABTS radical scavenging compared to HD (43.18%) and SD (76.44%). While SD demonstrated superior flavor development, yielding the highest volatile compound content in XHH (69.01 mg/kg vs. FD: 16.02, HD: 15.84 mg/kg), HD showed selective advantages in mineral retention, particularly for calcium in MLHH (HD: 4025 mg/g, FD: 3537 mg/g, SD: 3225 mg/g). This comprehensive analysis thus establishes evidence-based guidelines for tailoring drying protocols according to specific quality requirements, facilitating targeted approaches in functional food development and nutraceutical manufacturing. • Evaluated freeze-drying (FD), hot-air drying (HD), and sun drying (SD) on Hemerocallis citrina. • FD preserved the highest levels of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidants. • SD retained a diverse flavor profile with 36–37 volatile compounds. • HD effectively preserved potassium and calcium but reduced thermolabile nutrients. • Findings guide tailored drying methods for optimized food and nutraceutical quality.

LWTVol. 218
Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), China Federation of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Agriculture and Biological Studies
57.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.