Understanding the Consumers' Experiences of Safewards: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Safewards is a model and set of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness in reducing conflict and containment which are associated with negative consumer experiences within inpatient mental health settings. Safewards has been widely adopted internationally as a way of enhancing safety and reducing restrictive practices. Despite this, consumers' experiences of Safewards and its effect on their personal safety are less understood and therefore require further exploration. This qualitative exploratory study sought to explore consumers' experiences of Safewards in acute inpatient mental health units. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used for reporting purposes. Fifteen consumers across two sites participated in semi-structured focus groups. Thematic analysis generated four themes: (1) engaging consumers in Safewards, (2) consumers supporting each other, (3) interacting and communicating and (4) access, availability and expectations. Participants expressed positive views about Safewards and wanted to be more involved in its day-to-day application. Enhanced consumer involvement in Safewards was associated with improved safety and wellbeing for consumers within acute inpatient mental health units. These findings have the potential to influence practice towards improving the consumers experience of Safewards. This requires an exploration of ways to harness informal consumer supports, recognising that consumers need to spend meaningful time with nurses to feel safe and acknowledging that all forms of restrictive practice have an impact on consumers within acute inpatient environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70004
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Consumers' Experiences of Safewards: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Bridget Hamilton, Brenda Happell, Antony Mullen, Stephanie Skinner
1 links
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Understanding the Consumers' Experiences of Safewards: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Bridget Hamilton, Brenda Happell, Antony Mullen, Stephanie Skinner
article en

Abstract

Safewards is a model and set of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness in reducing conflict and containment which are associated with negative consumer experiences within inpatient mental health settings. Safewards has been widely adopted internationally as a way of enhancing safety and reducing restrictive practices. Despite this, consumers' experiences of Safewards and its effect on their personal safety are less understood and therefore require further exploration. This qualitative exploratory study sought to explore consumers' experiences of Safewards in acute inpatient mental health units. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used for reporting purposes. Fifteen consumers across two sites participated in semi-structured focus groups. Thematic analysis generated four themes: (1) engaging consumers in Safewards, (2) consumers supporting each other, (3) interacting and communicating and (4) access, availability and expectations. Participants expressed positive views about Safewards and wanted to be more involved in its day-to-day application. Enhanced consumer involvement in Safewards was associated with improved safety and wellbeing for consumers within acute inpatient mental health units. These findings have the potential to influence practice towards improving the consumers experience of Safewards. This requires an exploration of ways to harness informal consumer supports, recognising that consumers need to spend meaningful time with nurses to feel safe and acknowledging that all forms of restrictive practice have an impact on consumers within acute inpatient environments.

International Journal of Mental Health NursingVol. 34(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Mental Health Australia (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), Southern Cross University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Southern Cross University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.