Digitalization of public administration: benefits and risks

The paper is devoted to understanding the advantages and risks of digitalization of public administration. The author elucidates the relationship between digitalization and digital transformation of public administration. The author foretells successful digitalization of traditional means of control and the formation of mixed algorithms for human and machine activities in the field of public administration. The paper considers seven benefits (convenience of management activities; acceleration of management communications; simplification of management procedures; the use of big data; fundamentally new accessibility of public authorities and public services; cost optimization; humanization of public administration) and seven risks (expanding the field for bureaucratic manipulation; excessive proactivity of public structures; doubling the procedures for document processing and, above all, reporting; the increasing reliance of public administration on digital technologies; the growth of cybercrime opportunities, including official cybercrimes; «profanation» or fictitiousness of digitalization of public administration; the possibility of loss of subjectivity of humanity management) digitalization of public administration. The author concluded that digitalization does not overcome the substantive shortcomings of public administration, but only aggravates them, providing unscrupulous administrators with new opportunities for misconduct. It is possible and necessary to develop public administration in traditional ways, combining them with the introduction of digital technologies. At the same time, the transfer of administrative decision-making to artificial intelligence seems to be a dangerous and inhuman scenario. The author highlights the decisive role of a person in public administration. One should not impose excessive expectations on artificial intelligence and digital technologies in general, carry out digitalization for the sake of digitalization without visible benefits for society, and even expose humanity to the risks of unpredictable administrative decisions and their consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rossijskoe pravo onlajn
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2024.32.4.005-010
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitalization of public administration: benefits and risks

A. N. Chertkov
Rossijskoe pravo onlajn
Legal and Policy Issues
article

Digitalization of public administration: benefits and risks

A. N. Chertkov
article en

Abstract

The paper is devoted to understanding the advantages and risks of digitalization of public administration. The author elucidates the relationship between digitalization and digital transformation of public administration. The author foretells successful digitalization of traditional means of control and the formation of mixed algorithms for human and machine activities in the field of public administration. The paper considers seven benefits (convenience of management activities; acceleration of management communications; simplification of management procedures; the use of big data; fundamentally new accessibility of public authorities and public services; cost optimization; humanization of public administration) and seven risks (expanding the field for bureaucratic manipulation; excessive proactivity of public structures; doubling the procedures for document processing and, above all, reporting; the increasing reliance of public administration on digital technologies; the growth of cybercrime opportunities, including official cybercrimes; «profanation» or fictitiousness of digitalization of public administration; the possibility of loss of subjectivity of humanity management) digitalization of public administration. The author concluded that digitalization does not overcome the substantive shortcomings of public administration, but only aggravates them, providing unscrupulous administrators with new opportunities for misconduct. It is possible and necessary to develop public administration in traditional ways, combining them with the introduction of digital technologies. At the same time, the transfer of administrative decision-making to artificial intelligence seems to be a dangerous and inhuman scenario. The author highlights the decisive role of a person in public administration. One should not impose excessive expectations on artificial intelligence and digital technologies in general, carry out digitalization for the sake of digitalization without visible benefits for society, and even expose humanity to the risks of unpredictable administrative decisions and their consequences.

Rossijskoe pravo onlajn(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digitalization of public administration: benefits and risks — A. N. Chertkov · Rossijskoe pravo onlajn (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS