Exploring Modern Heroism Based on ‘Mutual Beneficence’

Heroes and heroic actions represent the pinnacle of human life. The most noble action that a human can perform is heroism, and throughout history, humanity has bestowed the title of hero upon those who lived such extraordinary lives and then praised them from within that categorization. Traditionally, when discussing heroes, there has always been an archetype of a hero, with a dichotomy of ‘I’ or ‘We’ versus an opposing ‘other’ as an enemy that should be eliminated — whether it be a person or a system. However, in modern times, the archetype of the hero based on sacrifice and opposing forces is undergoing a transformation. This change is due to the recognition of individuals who are acclaimed as heroes without having to inflict harm upon an opponent. If the essential reason why heroes have been praised in human history was for ‘saving’ someone or something, then the heroes of contemporary society are becoming more closely aligned with the essence of preservation or symbiosis, breaking away from the incidental attributes of destruction or violence, even more so than in the past. In conclusion, heroes are generally conceptualized as positive and pro-social phenomena, and the destructive aspects of heroism, and even its madness, have been largely ignored. Based on the philosophical concept of mutual beneficence (sangsaeng, 相生) in Daesoon Thought, this study will examine the destructive attributes of heroes and then reevaluate the characteristics of heroes from the perspective of saving others.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2024.51.0.173
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Modern Heroism Based on ‘Mutual Beneficence’

Jin Young Kim, Youngjun Lee
The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
article

Exploring Modern Heroism Based on ‘Mutual Beneficence’

Jin Young Kim, Youngjun Lee
article en

Abstract

Heroes and heroic actions represent the pinnacle of human life. The most noble action that a human can perform is heroism, and throughout history, humanity has bestowed the title of hero upon those who lived such extraordinary lives and then praised them from within that categorization. Traditionally, when discussing heroes, there has always been an archetype of a hero, with a dichotomy of ‘I’ or ‘We’ versus an opposing ‘other’ as an enemy that should be eliminated — whether it be a person or a system. However, in modern times, the archetype of the hero based on sacrifice and opposing forces is undergoing a transformation. This change is due to the recognition of individuals who are acclaimed as heroes without having to inflict harm upon an opponent. If the essential reason why heroes have been praised in human history was for ‘saving’ someone or something, then the heroes of contemporary society are becoming more closely aligned with the essence of preservation or symbiosis, breaking away from the incidental attributes of destruction or violence, even more so than in the past. In conclusion, heroes are generally conceptualized as positive and pro-social phenomena, and the destructive aspects of heroism, and even its madness, have been largely ignored. Based on the philosophical concept of mutual beneficence (sangsaeng, 相生) in Daesoon Thought, this study will examine the destructive attributes of heroes and then reevaluate the characteristics of heroes from the perspective of saving others.

The Journal of Daesoon Academy of SciencesVol. 51
Korea University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.