SCCA Saudi Case Law Study: Three Years in Review

In 2021, driven by the interest in understanding the arbitration ecosystem in Saudi Arabia and promoting Riyadh as an arbitral seat, the Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) collaborated with the Saudi Ministry of Justice (MOJ) in soliciting over 1400 judgments of courts of appeal, as well as certain Supreme Court judgments, issued between 2017 and 2022 relating to motions in aid of arbitration proceedings and motions to enforce or annul arbitral awards. It was particularly important for SCCA to attach empirical data to the enforceability (or not) of arbitral awards in Saudi Arabia. This article outlines SCCA’s statistical findings based on the culmination of three years of case law review and summarizes certain interesting decisions that arose in the review process. Indeed, the case law study revealed results far beyond SCCA’s expectations, demonstrating a consistent record of an enforcement rate exceeding 92% in every batch of reviewed judgments. The case law study also revealed the courts’ deference to arbitration and an unwillingness to assert jurisdiction in those cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Arbitration
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2024032
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SCCA Saudi Case Law Study: Three Years in Review

Dara Sahab
Journal of International Arbitration
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

SCCA Saudi Case Law Study: Three Years in Review

Dara Sahab
article en

Abstract

In 2021, driven by the interest in understanding the arbitration ecosystem in Saudi Arabia and promoting Riyadh as an arbitral seat, the Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) collaborated with the Saudi Ministry of Justice (MOJ) in soliciting over 1400 judgments of courts of appeal, as well as certain Supreme Court judgments, issued between 2017 and 2022 relating to motions in aid of arbitration proceedings and motions to enforce or annul arbitral awards. It was particularly important for SCCA to attach empirical data to the enforceability (or not) of arbitral awards in Saudi Arabia. This article outlines SCCA’s statistical findings based on the culmination of three years of case law review and summarizes certain interesting decisions that arose in the review process. Indeed, the case law study revealed results far beyond SCCA’s expectations, demonstrating a consistent record of an enforcement rate exceeding 92% in every batch of reviewed judgments. The case law study also revealed the courts’ deference to arbitration and an unwillingness to assert jurisdiction in those cases.

Journal of International ArbitrationVol. 41(Issue 6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SCCA Saudi Case Law Study: Three Years in Review — Dara Sahab · Journal of International Arbitration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS