When Claimants Can’t Pay: A new Approach to Security for Costs in Arbitration?

A ground often invoked for security for costs in arbitral proceedings is the counterparty’s financial difficulties. Yet, a request on this ground is rarely successful because of one key requirement: That of a significant deterioration of finances. There is a consensus in Swiss doctrine to uphold this requirement for international arbitration. It also appears in domestic arbitration, despite the relevant provision only requiring the appearance of insolvency. However, it is not paralleled in Swiss-based litigation when it comes to security of costs. This article first examines the reasoning behind requiring a significant deterioration in finances. It then seeks to examine the justification of the requirement and proposes an adjusted approach which still seeks to adequately restrict security orders while more fairly dividing the burden of proof.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ASA Bulletin
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2024111
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Claimants Can’t Pay: A new Approach to Security for Costs in Arbitration?

Loïc Stucki, Margaretha Schulz
ASA Bulletin
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

When Claimants Can’t Pay: A new Approach to Security for Costs in Arbitration?

Loïc Stucki, Margaretha Schulz
article en

Abstract

A ground often invoked for security for costs in arbitral proceedings is the counterparty’s financial difficulties. Yet, a request on this ground is rarely successful because of one key requirement: That of a significant deterioration of finances. There is a consensus in Swiss doctrine to uphold this requirement for international arbitration. It also appears in domestic arbitration, despite the relevant provision only requiring the appearance of insolvency. However, it is not paralleled in Swiss-based litigation when it comes to security of costs. This article first examines the reasoning behind requiring a significant deterioration in finances. It then seeks to examine the justification of the requirement and proposes an adjusted approach which still seeks to adequately restrict security orders while more fairly dividing the burden of proof.

ASA BulletinVol. 42(Issue 4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.