A220 LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF USTEKINUMAB DOSE ESCALATION IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Ustekinumab dose escalation (DE) may be an effective strategy to recapture clinical response in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims The aim of this study was to assess the real-world long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab DE in patients with refractory UC. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with refractory UC who received at least one IV induction ustekinumab dose between January 2016 and November 2021. We compared ustekinumab DE to no DE, examining clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease outcomes. The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤ 2 without systemic corticosteroids) at the end of follow-up. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for factors associated with time to DE and a Kaplan-Meier plot was created for visualizing drug persistence probabilities. Results We enrolled 121 patients. Eighty-one patients (67%) underwent DE during a median follow-up of 141 weeks. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission at the end of follow-up was achieved for 53.2% (DE group) and 59.0% (non-DE group). In the DE group, 53% discontinued ustekinumab, mainly due to a lack of effectiveness. At the end of follow-up, 47% of DE patients remained on ustekinumab, compared to 55% in the non-DE group. Ustekinumab persistence probability after 2 years was 40% (DE group) versus 79% (non-DE group). Only 2 patients discontinued ustekinumab for adverse events. Conclusions Our results indicate that DE is a common method for optimizing ustekinumab treatment in refractory UC. While DE appears safe, effectiveness and drug persistence of DE beyond 2 years are limited. Table 1 Proportion of participants in corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, combined clinical/biochemical, endoscopic, and combined clinical/biochemical/endoscopic remission at year 1, year 2, and end of follow up for the DE group vs non-DE group. *In the DE group, 8 discontinued ustekinumab before 1 year and an additional 14 before 2 years. **In the non-DE group, 12 discontinued ustekinumab before 1 year and an additional 4 before 2 years. ***Additional patients missing from the denominators had missing values at the presented timepoints. Kaplan-Meier plot for probabilities of continued ustekinumab usage over the duration of follow-up in years. The green (upper) line represents the non-DE group, the red (middle) line represents the entire cohort, and the blue (bottom) line represents the DE group. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae059.220
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A220 LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF USTEKINUMAB DOSE ESCALATION IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Jesse Siffledeen, Kevin Wong, L van Lierop, Pepijn W. A. Thomas et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

A220 LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF USTEKINUMAB DOSE ESCALATION IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Jesse Siffledeen, Kevin Wong, L van Lierop, Pepijn W. A. Thomas, Frank Hoentjen, Cathy Lu, Levinus A. Dieleman, Ryan E. Rosentreter, Daniel C. Baumgart, Christopher Ma, Karen I. Kroeker, Farhad Peerani, Larissa Albino, Brendan P. Halloran, Lillian Du
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Ustekinumab dose escalation (DE) may be an effective strategy to recapture clinical response in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims The aim of this study was to assess the real-world long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab DE in patients with refractory UC. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with refractory UC who received at least one IV induction ustekinumab dose between January 2016 and November 2021. We compared ustekinumab DE to no DE, examining clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease outcomes. The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤ 2 without systemic corticosteroids) at the end of follow-up. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for factors associated with time to DE and a Kaplan-Meier plot was created for visualizing drug persistence probabilities. Results We enrolled 121 patients. Eighty-one patients (67%) underwent DE during a median follow-up of 141 weeks. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission at the end of follow-up was achieved for 53.2% (DE group) and 59.0% (non-DE group). In the DE group, 53% discontinued ustekinumab, mainly due to a lack of effectiveness. At the end of follow-up, 47% of DE patients remained on ustekinumab, compared to 55% in the non-DE group. Ustekinumab persistence probability after 2 years was 40% (DE group) versus 79% (non-DE group). Only 2 patients discontinued ustekinumab for adverse events. Conclusions Our results indicate that DE is a common method for optimizing ustekinumab treatment in refractory UC. While DE appears safe, effectiveness and drug persistence of DE beyond 2 years are limited. Table 1 Proportion of participants in corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, combined clinical/biochemical, endoscopic, and combined clinical/biochemical/endoscopic remission at year 1, year 2, and end of follow up for the DE group vs non-DE group. *In the DE group, 8 discontinued ustekinumab before 1 year and an additional 14 before 2 years. **In the non-DE group, 12 discontinued ustekinumab before 1 year and an additional 4 before 2 years. ***Additional patients missing from the denominators had missing values at the presented timepoints. Kaplan-Meier plot for probabilities of continued ustekinumab usage over the duration of follow-up in years. The green (upper) line represents the non-DE group, the red (middle) line represents the entire cohort, and the blue (bottom) line represents the DE group. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.