A191 REAL WORLD USE OF ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR AMGEVITA® (ABP-501) IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN CANADA

Abstract Background ABP-501 (AMGEVITA®), biosimilar to adalimumab reference product (RP), was approved by Health Canada in 2021 for use in different immune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims To assess the real-world use, effectiveness and satisfaction of ABP-501 in adalimumab naïve and switch patients with IBD across Canada. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi IBD Disease Specific ProgrammeTM, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection from physicians conducted in Canada between July 2023 and June 2024. Gastroenterologists (GIs) provided data on their patients with IBD including demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment satisfaction. Analyses were descriptive. Results Overall, 10 GIs reported data on 101 patients (60 CD and 41 UC): 80 initiated ABP-501 as first adalimumab therapy (initiators) and 21 switched directly to ABP-501 from RP (switchers) (Table 1). Mean [standard deviation; SD] time receiving ABP-501 at consultation was 13.2 [11.6] and 21.6 [9.9] months for initiators and switchers, respectively. Switchers received RP for 48 [27.1] months before switching to ABP-501. Most patients were receiving adalimumab as their first advanced therapy (70% initiators, 90% switchers). The main reasons for switching from RP to ABP-501 were cost effectiveness for the healthcare system (57%) and insurance coverage (43%). At consultation, most initiators and switchers had mild disease (92%, 95%, respectively), were in clinical (91%; 95%, respectively) and endoscopic (66%; 81% respectively) remission (Figure 1) and had an improving/stable disease (97%; 100%, respectively). Treatment targets for initiators and switchers included maintaining clinical remission (n=54; n=18, achieved by 100%, respectively) and maintaining endoscopic remission (n=37; n=17, achieved by 86% and 100%, respectively). GIs were satisfied with ABP-501 treatment (99% initiators, 100% switchers). Conclusions Most patients with IBD treated with ABP-501 as initiating or continuing adalimumab therapy in a real-world setting had mild disease, were in remission and had an improving/stable disease. Patients who switched from RP to ABP-501 switched mainly for economic reasons. GIs reported high levels of satisfaction. Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD receiving ABP-501 at consultation Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae059.191
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A191 REAL WORLD USE OF ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR AMGEVITA® (ABP-501) IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN CANADA

Rina Lukanova, Rajvi J. Wani, Fatima Dawod, Muhammad O. Chohan et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

A191 REAL WORLD USE OF ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR AMGEVITA® (ABP-501) IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN CANADA

Rina Lukanova, Rajvi J. Wani, Fatima Dawod, Muhammad O. Chohan, Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas, Owen Mooney, June Copeman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background ABP-501 (AMGEVITA®), biosimilar to adalimumab reference product (RP), was approved by Health Canada in 2021 for use in different immune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims To assess the real-world use, effectiveness and satisfaction of ABP-501 in adalimumab naïve and switch patients with IBD across Canada. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi IBD Disease Specific ProgrammeTM, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection from physicians conducted in Canada between July 2023 and June 2024. Gastroenterologists (GIs) provided data on their patients with IBD including demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment satisfaction. Analyses were descriptive. Results Overall, 10 GIs reported data on 101 patients (60 CD and 41 UC): 80 initiated ABP-501 as first adalimumab therapy (initiators) and 21 switched directly to ABP-501 from RP (switchers) (Table 1). Mean [standard deviation; SD] time receiving ABP-501 at consultation was 13.2 [11.6] and 21.6 [9.9] months for initiators and switchers, respectively. Switchers received RP for 48 [27.1] months before switching to ABP-501. Most patients were receiving adalimumab as their first advanced therapy (70% initiators, 90% switchers). The main reasons for switching from RP to ABP-501 were cost effectiveness for the healthcare system (57%) and insurance coverage (43%). At consultation, most initiators and switchers had mild disease (92%, 95%, respectively), were in clinical (91%; 95%, respectively) and endoscopic (66%; 81% respectively) remission (Figure 1) and had an improving/stable disease (97%; 100%, respectively). Treatment targets for initiators and switchers included maintaining clinical remission (n=54; n=18, achieved by 100%, respectively) and maintaining endoscopic remission (n=37; n=17, achieved by 86% and 100%, respectively). GIs were satisfied with ABP-501 treatment (99% initiators, 100% switchers). Conclusions Most patients with IBD treated with ABP-501 as initiating or continuing adalimumab therapy in a real-world setting had mild disease, were in remission and had an improving/stable disease. Patients who switched from RP to ABP-501 switched mainly for economic reasons. GIs reported high levels of satisfaction. Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD receiving ABP-501 at consultation Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Amgen (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.