A107 EXAMINING FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO GENDER PAY DIFFERENCES AMONG ONTARIO PHYSICIANS IN PROCEDURAL SUBSPECIALTIES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, INCLUDING GASTROENTEROLOGY

Abstract Background Prior research has shown that gender pay inequity exists among physicians, with little improvement in the last few years. A study examining the physician gender pay gap in Ontario showed that women physicians earned 13.5% less than men daily, even after correcting for factors such as practice characteristics, specialty and rurality. Aims We aimed to identify factors contributing to gender-based differential billing among physicians in Ontario, with a specific focus on providers in procedural sub-specialties of internal medicine including gastroenterology. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) in the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years. OHIP billings were used to estimate differences in gross payments between male and female physicians in procedural subspecialties of internal medicine, including gastroenterology, cardiology and respirology. Physicians who submitted claims to OHIP were included. Pay gaps were calculated annually. Chi-square test was used to calculate differences between categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. Results A total of 3600 physicians were included in the study sample (1212 [33.7%] women and 2388 [66.3%] men). Male physicians in procedural subspecialties earned an average of $391,734.76 more than female physicians (p<0.001) with male gastroenterologists earning an average of $154,698.86 more (p<0.001). The total number of procedural days was higher for men (49 vs 25; p<0.001), with male gastroenterologists having more endoscopy days as compared to their female counterparts (134 vs 108; p<0.001). Male physicians in procedural subspecialties had higher percentage of days with after-hours billings (8.5 vs 5.4; p< 0.001) and weekend billings (4.2 vs 3.5; p<0.01) compared to female physicians, and were less likely to work part-time (343 men [14%] vs 334 women [28%]; p<0.001). Conclusions Our study noted significant differences in gross payments between men and women physicians in procedural specialties of internal medicine including gastroenterology, which may be explained by total hours worked, after-hours work and number of procedural days. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae059.107
Primary Topic
Dental Education, Practice, Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A107 EXAMINING FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO GENDER PAY DIFFERENCES AMONG ONTARIO PHYSICIANS IN PROCEDURAL SUBSPECIALTIES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, INCLUDING GASTROENTEROLOGY

F Balderrama, Lyn M. Sibley, Natasha Bollegala, Maham Bushra
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Dental Education, Practice, Research
article

A107 EXAMINING FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO GENDER PAY DIFFERENCES AMONG ONTARIO PHYSICIANS IN PROCEDURAL SUBSPECIALTIES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, INCLUDING GASTROENTEROLOGY

F Balderrama, Lyn M. Sibley, Natasha Bollegala, Maham Bushra
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prior research has shown that gender pay inequity exists among physicians, with little improvement in the last few years. A study examining the physician gender pay gap in Ontario showed that women physicians earned 13.5% less than men daily, even after correcting for factors such as practice characteristics, specialty and rurality. Aims We aimed to identify factors contributing to gender-based differential billing among physicians in Ontario, with a specific focus on providers in procedural sub-specialties of internal medicine including gastroenterology. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) in the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years. OHIP billings were used to estimate differences in gross payments between male and female physicians in procedural subspecialties of internal medicine, including gastroenterology, cardiology and respirology. Physicians who submitted claims to OHIP were included. Pay gaps were calculated annually. Chi-square test was used to calculate differences between categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. Results A total of 3600 physicians were included in the study sample (1212 [33.7%] women and 2388 [66.3%] men). Male physicians in procedural subspecialties earned an average of $391,734.76 more than female physicians (p<0.001) with male gastroenterologists earning an average of $154,698.86 more (p<0.001). The total number of procedural days was higher for men (49 vs 25; p<0.001), with male gastroenterologists having more endoscopy days as compared to their female counterparts (134 vs 108; p<0.001). Male physicians in procedural subspecialties had higher percentage of days with after-hours billings (8.5 vs 5.4; p< 0.001) and weekend billings (4.2 vs 3.5; p<0.01) compared to female physicians, and were less likely to work part-time (343 men [14%] vs 334 women [28%]; p<0.001). Conclusions Our study noted significant differences in gross payments between men and women physicians in procedural specialties of internal medicine including gastroenterology, which may be explained by total hours worked, after-hours work and number of procedural days. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Ontario Medical Association (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Dental Education, Practice, Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.