Constructivism in European school education: A qualitative systematic review

This paper undertakes a qualitative systematic review focusing on the definition and application of the concept 'constructivism' within primary and secondary school education, covering students aged from 6 to 18 years, corresponding to ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) stages 1, 2 and 3. In recent years, there has been increasing discourse advocating for a paradigm shift towards constructivism in educational studies. Yet, within the realm of school education, there exists considerable diversity among authors in their interpretations of constructivism, contributing to a wide range of perspectives on its practical implementation. The aim of this study is to investigate how research literature in the field of school education defines and applies constructivism, and to describe the possible factors contributing to varying interpretations of constructivism. A review of peer-reviewed scientific articles on the practical implementation of constructivism in Europe encompassed studies from 37 countries - Eurydice Network national units (27 EU Member States along with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of North Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland and Türkiye). The study utilised following databases: EBSCOhost (including Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, Central & Eastern European Academic Source, ERIC), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. 33 articles that met the search criteria were chosen for analysis. As a result of the review, four conceptual categories were identified and formulated: Individual domain, Social domain, Cognitive domain, and Emotional domain. Various theoretical paradigms as potential causes for the diversity of definitions are posited. The results from this study can assist educators in gaining a deeper understanding and application of the constructivism concept. The core categories identified in definitions and usage of constructivism represent an asset for school pedagogy, applicable in both theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Reviews
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025186
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructivism in European school education: A qualitative systematic review

Inta Bula-Biteniece, Antra Gulbe, Roberts Radičuks, Beata Paškevica
1 citations
Multidisciplinary Reviews
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
article

Constructivism in European school education: A qualitative systematic review

Inta Bula-Biteniece, Antra Gulbe, Roberts Radičuks, Beata Paškevica
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper undertakes a qualitative systematic review focusing on the definition and application of the concept 'constructivism' within primary and secondary school education, covering students aged from 6 to 18 years, corresponding to ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) stages 1, 2 and 3. In recent years, there has been increasing discourse advocating for a paradigm shift towards constructivism in educational studies. Yet, within the realm of school education, there exists considerable diversity among authors in their interpretations of constructivism, contributing to a wide range of perspectives on its practical implementation. The aim of this study is to investigate how research literature in the field of school education defines and applies constructivism, and to describe the possible factors contributing to varying interpretations of constructivism. A review of peer-reviewed scientific articles on the practical implementation of constructivism in Europe encompassed studies from 37 countries - Eurydice Network national units (27 EU Member States along with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of North Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland and Türkiye). The study utilised following databases: EBSCOhost (including Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, Central & Eastern European Academic Source, ERIC), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. 33 articles that met the search criteria were chosen for analysis. As a result of the review, four conceptual categories were identified and formulated: Individual domain, Social domain, Cognitive domain, and Emotional domain. Various theoretical paradigms as potential causes for the diversity of definitions are posited. The results from this study can assist educators in gaining a deeper understanding and application of the constructivism concept. The core categories identified in definitions and usage of constructivism represent an asset for school pedagogy, applicable in both theory and practice.

Multidisciplinary ReviewsVol. 8(6)
Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LV), National Library of Latvia (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.