How behavioral science interventions can disrupt the cycle of bias in AI-assisted police work

When making decisions in high-pressure situations, police officers experience cognitive demands and often lack access to data about the people with whom they are interacting. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools that provide such data can potentially improve officers’ ability to respond effectively to calls and thus bolster public safety. However, research in diverse social sciences has documented persistent biases in AI-assisted work. We propose a framework for understanding how bias can creep into AI-assisted police work and how to intervene. In a cycle of bias, AI tools provide biased information to officers, which in turn promotes biased responses during interactions with the public, ultimately resulting in biased incident reports that amplify the original biases in the AI systems. Our proposed interventions focus on training and nudges that increase officers’ use of deliberative processing, empathic mindsets, and perspective-getting techniques and encourage the writing of detailed, debiased incident reports. We recommend taking a cognitive view of policing and drawing on insights from behavioral science research to maximize the benefits of AI tools while minimizing the risk that they will amplify biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241300788
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How behavioral science interventions can disrupt the cycle of bias in AI-assisted police work

Andrea G. Dittmann, Shane Schweitzer, Kyle Dobson
1 citations
Behavioral Science & Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

How behavioral science interventions can disrupt the cycle of bias in AI-assisted police work

Andrea G. Dittmann, Shane Schweitzer, Kyle Dobson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When making decisions in high-pressure situations, police officers experience cognitive demands and often lack access to data about the people with whom they are interacting. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools that provide such data can potentially improve officers’ ability to respond effectively to calls and thus bolster public safety. However, research in diverse social sciences has documented persistent biases in AI-assisted work. We propose a framework for understanding how bias can creep into AI-assisted police work and how to intervene. In a cycle of bias, AI tools provide biased information to officers, which in turn promotes biased responses during interactions with the public, ultimately resulting in biased incident reports that amplify the original biases in the AI systems. Our proposed interventions focus on training and nudges that increase officers’ use of deliberative processing, empathic mindsets, and perspective-getting techniques and encourage the writing of detailed, debiased incident reports. We recommend taking a cognitive view of policing and drawing on insights from behavioral science research to maximize the benefits of AI tools while minimizing the risk that they will amplify biases.

Behavioral Science & PolicyVol. 10(2)
University of Southern California (US), Northeastern University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.