Responsible governance of genomics data and biospecimens in the context of broad consent: experiences of a pioneering access committee in Africa

International collaboration in genomic research is gaining momentum in African countries and is often supported by external funding. Over the last decade, there has been an increased interest in African genomic data. The contribution of this rich data resource in understanding diseases predominant in both African and global populations has been limited to date. There has been some non-governmental funding dedicated to the advancement of genomic research and innovation by African-based and African-led research groups, but the impact of these initiatives is hard to quantify. However, there is now an opportunity for the global research community to leverage decades of genomic data and biospecimens originating from African populations. The experience we describe in this paper is of an access governance framework established under the Human, Heredity, and Health in Africa (H3A) consortium, given the task of managing wider access to the data and biospecimen resources collected via its various projects. The function of the Data and Biospecimen Access Committee (DBAC) is to facilitate the advancement of medicine and health while fostering the development of bioinformatics capabilities at Africa-based institutions or regional hubs. Our collective experiences and lessons learnt as a committee provide examples of nuanced considerations when evaluating access to African data. The committee was semi-autonomous in its establishment and had independence in decision-making. The DBAC continually advocates for the responsible use of genomic data and biospecimens that were obtained from African research participants, under broad consent, by primary researchers who no longer have oversight over the future use of these resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016026
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible governance of genomics data and biospecimens in the context of broad consent: experiences of a pioneering access committee in Africa

Ahmed Rebaï, Robyn Kerr, Jenniffer M. Mabuka, Daima Bukini et al.
8 citations
BMJ Global Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
15.03
article

Responsible governance of genomics data and biospecimens in the context of broad consent: experiences of a pioneering access committee in Africa

Ahmed Rebaï, Robyn Kerr, Jenniffer M. Mabuka, Daima Bukini, Collet Dandara, Kobus Herbst, Pamela Andanda, Rosalyn Wamuyu, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

International collaboration in genomic research is gaining momentum in African countries and is often supported by external funding. Over the last decade, there has been an increased interest in African genomic data. The contribution of this rich data resource in understanding diseases predominant in both African and global populations has been limited to date. There has been some non-governmental funding dedicated to the advancement of genomic research and innovation by African-based and African-led research groups, but the impact of these initiatives is hard to quantify. However, there is now an opportunity for the global research community to leverage decades of genomic data and biospecimens originating from African populations. The experience we describe in this paper is of an access governance framework established under the Human, Heredity, and Health in Africa (H3A) consortium, given the task of managing wider access to the data and biospecimen resources collected via its various projects. The function of the Data and Biospecimen Access Committee (DBAC) is to facilitate the advancement of medicine and health while fostering the development of bioinformatics capabilities at Africa-based institutions or regional hubs. Our collective experiences and lessons learnt as a committee provide examples of nuanced considerations when evaluating access to African data. The committee was semi-autonomous in its establishment and had independence in decision-making. The DBAC continually advocates for the responsible use of genomic data and biospecimens that were obtained from African research participants, under broad consent, by primary researchers who no longer have oversight over the future use of these resources.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 10(2)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Johns Hopkins University (US), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (US), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), Lagos State Health Service Commission (NG), Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax (TN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics in Clinical Research
15.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.