Peer assessment improving writing skills in efl students.

The following study analyzes peer assessment's impact on improving academic writing skills. Peer assessment allows students to review tasks from other classmates; this is a controlled environment where students can evaluate each other's work to give feedback on each activity, working in class as a learning strategy. This research examines how controlled and structured peer review sessions improve students' ability to write better and develop their writing activities. Participants included two groups of around nine students of the same level but from different classes, who engaged in daily peer assessment activities for over a week. The study uses mixed methods to reach the result, incorporating quantitative analysis of pre-and post-intervention writing scores with qualitative data from a students' survey. The outcome indicates that students who participated in peer assessment demonstrated improvement in organization, paragraph structure, and grammatical accuracy compared to those who only had feedback from their teacher in the classroom. Furthermore, peer assessment helps students learn how to follow a rubric format. However, there were some challenges, such as mistrusting the criteria of other peers and the need for positive feedback. This research concludes with recommendations for adding peer assessment into curriculum design so that teachers feel encouraged to let students explore this learning skill in class. By making students think outside of the box and changing the aim from a centric class focus on the teacher to a more collaborative one, peer assessment is a tool that can lead to better learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60100/rcmg.v6i1.434
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer assessment improving writing skills in efl students.

Carla Isabel Lozano Alvarado, Bruno Fabio Macías Pino, Priscila Asunción Larrea Llerena
Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Peer assessment improving writing skills in efl students.

Carla Isabel Lozano Alvarado, Bruno Fabio Macías Pino, Priscila Asunción Larrea Llerena
article en

Abstract

The following study analyzes peer assessment's impact on improving academic writing skills. Peer assessment allows students to review tasks from other classmates; this is a controlled environment where students can evaluate each other's work to give feedback on each activity, working in class as a learning strategy. This research examines how controlled and structured peer review sessions improve students' ability to write better and develop their writing activities. Participants included two groups of around nine students of the same level but from different classes, who engaged in daily peer assessment activities for over a week. The study uses mixed methods to reach the result, incorporating quantitative analysis of pre-and post-intervention writing scores with qualitative data from a students' survey. The outcome indicates that students who participated in peer assessment demonstrated improvement in organization, paragraph structure, and grammatical accuracy compared to those who only had feedback from their teacher in the classroom. Furthermore, peer assessment helps students learn how to follow a rubric format. However, there were some challenges, such as mistrusting the criteria of other peers and the need for positive feedback. This research concludes with recommendations for adding peer assessment into curriculum design so that teachers feel encouraged to let students explore this learning skill in class. By making students think outside of the box and changing the aim from a centric class focus on the teacher to a more collaborative one, peer assessment is a tool that can lead to better learning.

Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerandoVol. 6(1)
Universidad Estatal de Milagro (EC)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peer assessment improving writing skills in efl students. — Carla Isabel Lozano Alvarado, Bruno Fabio Macías Pino, et al. · Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS