Language Markers and Social Identity in Digital Communication Among Generation Z in Indonesia

This study examines the use of language markers in digital communication among Generation Z in Indonesia, focusing on their functions and socio-cultural implications. Using a qualitative approach, the research analyzed data from document observations, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. Data analysis involved four stages: data reduction, contextual analysis, triangulation, and interpretation. The findings show that markers like “so,” “then,” “maybe,” and “I guess” serve functions such as enhancing politeness, clarifying messages, and fostering familiarity. These markers also reflect globalization’s influence, cultural values of politeness and inclusiveness, and Generation Z’s digital norms. The study illustrates how linguistic choices shape social identity, highlighting language markers’ role in effective communication. The results offer valuable insights into Generation Z’s communication practices and implications for cross-cultural and intergenerational dialogue in digital spaces

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Linguistics.
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58989/appling.v1i2.21
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language Markers and Social Identity in Digital Communication Among Generation Z in Indonesia

Herlandri Eka Jayaputri, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz
Applied Linguistics.
Islamic Finance and Communication
article

Language Markers and Social Identity in Digital Communication Among Generation Z in Indonesia

Herlandri Eka Jayaputri, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz
article en

Abstract

This study examines the use of language markers in digital communication among Generation Z in Indonesia, focusing on their functions and socio-cultural implications. Using a qualitative approach, the research analyzed data from document observations, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. Data analysis involved four stages: data reduction, contextual analysis, triangulation, and interpretation. The findings show that markers like “so,” “then,” “maybe,” and “I guess” serve functions such as enhancing politeness, clarifying messages, and fostering familiarity. These markers also reflect globalization’s influence, cultural values of politeness and inclusiveness, and Generation Z’s digital norms. The study illustrates how linguistic choices shape social identity, highlighting language markers’ role in effective communication. The results offer valuable insights into Generation Z’s communication practices and implications for cross-cultural and intergenerational dialogue in digital spaces

Applied Linguistics.Vol. 1(2)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Islamic Finance and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Language Markers and Social Identity in Digital Communication Among Generation Z in Indonesia — Herlandri Eka Jayaputri, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz · Applied Linguistics. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS