Legal Certainty of Filing Judicial Review in Tax Dispute Resolution After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXI/2024

Judicial review plays a crucial role in ensuring justice and legal certainty in tax dispute resolution, particularly in Indonesia, which adheres to the principle of a rule of law (Recht Staat). The Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXI/2024, however, limits the Directorate General of Taxes from filing judicial reviews, creating challenges for addressing errors in tax dispute decisions. This research uses a normative juridical approach to analyze the legal implications of this restriction, examining its impact on state revenue and legal fairness. Findings indicate that such limitations not only reduce legal certainty but also hinder the correction of judicial errors, potentially causing state financial losses. To address these issues, the study recommends a regulatory model that balances the rights of both taxpayers and tax authorities, fostering fair legal certainty and supporting tax revenue optimization for the State Budget. This regulatory refinement is vital for maintaining justice and fiscal stability in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i1.1549
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Certainty of Filing Judicial Review in Tax Dispute Resolution After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXI/2024

Vidyatika Dwi Listanti
1 links
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Legal Certainty of Filing Judicial Review in Tax Dispute Resolution After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXI/2024

Vidyatika Dwi Listanti
article en

Abstract

Judicial review plays a crucial role in ensuring justice and legal certainty in tax dispute resolution, particularly in Indonesia, which adheres to the principle of a rule of law (Recht Staat). The Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XXI/2024, however, limits the Directorate General of Taxes from filing judicial reviews, creating challenges for addressing errors in tax dispute decisions. This research uses a normative juridical approach to analyze the legal implications of this restriction, examining its impact on state revenue and legal fairness. Findings indicate that such limitations not only reduce legal certainty but also hinder the correction of judicial errors, potentially causing state financial losses. To address these issues, the study recommends a regulatory model that balances the rights of both taxpayers and tax authorities, fostering fair legal certainty and supporting tax revenue optimization for the State Budget. This regulatory refinement is vital for maintaining justice and fiscal stability in Indonesia.

Jurnal Indonesia Sosial SainsVol. 6(1)
Pancasila University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.