A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems

Transport within cities has been significantly changed by micromobility, particularly with the spread of shared systems. There are two types of these systems: station-based and free-floating. The former is characterised by the presence of stations in which a user can pick up or drop off a vehicle. The latter offers users the same functions but, where enabled, anywhere within the service area. Free-floating systems may appear more equitable and convenient than station-based ones, as stated in literature, but on the other hand, they can lead to unauthorised and irregular parking, obstructing pedestrians and vehicle flow. To reduce disordered parking, one of the possible solutions is to implement stations also in free-floating systems. However, this can reduce their attractiveness, forcing users to walk longer and making the system less fair. To address these issues, we proposed to convert a free-floating system into a mixed one with free-floating and station-based geofenced service sub-areas. The station locations are defined through a new multi-objective problem with the aim of finding a compromise among three objectives: the maximisation of drop-off station demand to minimise irregular parking, the minimisation of users’ walking distances in active and passive accessibility, and the minimisation of inequality in walking distance changes due to the conversion to a mixed system. This model was applied to a real case study and shows that our proposal can be of help for municipalities and operators in choosing fair station locations or a trade-off solution based on the importance they attach for one objective compared to the others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2025-02-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104390
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems

Simona De Bartolomeo, Michele Ottomanelli, Leonardo Caggiani
4 citations
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Smart Parking Systems Research
4.03
article

A multi-objective model for fair location of stations and geofence parking area to address disorderly parking in free-floating micromobility systems

Simona De Bartolomeo, Michele Ottomanelli, Leonardo Caggiani
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Transport within cities has been significantly changed by micromobility, particularly with the spread of shared systems. There are two types of these systems: station-based and free-floating. The former is characterised by the presence of stations in which a user can pick up or drop off a vehicle. The latter offers users the same functions but, where enabled, anywhere within the service area. Free-floating systems may appear more equitable and convenient than station-based ones, as stated in literature, but on the other hand, they can lead to unauthorised and irregular parking, obstructing pedestrians and vehicle flow. To reduce disordered parking, one of the possible solutions is to implement stations also in free-floating systems. However, this can reduce their attractiveness, forcing users to walk longer and making the system less fair. To address these issues, we proposed to convert a free-floating system into a mixed one with free-floating and station-based geofenced service sub-areas. The station locations are defined through a new multi-objective problem with the aim of finding a compromise among three objectives: the maximisation of drop-off station demand to minimise irregular parking, the minimisation of users’ walking distances in active and passive accessibility, and the minimisation of inequality in walking distance changes due to the conversion to a mixed system. This model was applied to a real case study and shows that our proposal can be of help for municipalities and operators in choosing fair station locations or a trade-off solution based on the importance they attach for one objective compared to the others.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 193
Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smart Parking Systems Research
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.