Comparative evaluation of cationic and anionic dye removal using graphene oxide fabricated by Hummers and Couette-Taylor flow methods

Graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention from researchers owing to its exceptional physicochemical properties. GO is typically synthesized through chemical oxidation followed by exfoliation processes. In this study, we employed the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method to produce GO. The Couette-Taylor flow method offers the advantage of shorter oxidation reaction times and reduced wastewater compared to the Hummers method. We conducted surface analysis (including scanning electron microscope(SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), Zeta potential, multiple-point Brunauer Emmett Teller(BET), and atomic force microscope(AFM)) to assess and compare the surface characteristics of GO. Our analysis revealed that GO synthesized using the Couette-Taylor flow method (GO/Taylor) exhibited smaller lateral sizes. Additionally, we performed Particle Size Distribution Analysis (PSA) to verify the particle distribution of GO. The mean particle sizes of GO produced via the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method were determined to be 49.87 μm and 28.97 μm, respectively. These differences in surface properties and particle sizes influenced the adsorption capacity of GO for dyes. Considering the polarity, Cationic dye (BV1) and anionic dye (RR141) were selected for our adsorption experiments based on their polarity. Furthermore, we employed kinetic and isotherm adsorption modeling to analyze the adsorption mechanism in detail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Trends
Published
2025-02-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100476
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Graphene research and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of cationic and anionic dye removal using graphene oxide fabricated by Hummers and Couette-Taylor flow methods

Yeojoon Yoon, Namgyu Kim, Chaehwi Lim, Junho Lee
3 citations
Carbon Trends
Graphene research and applications
1.55
article

Comparative evaluation of cationic and anionic dye removal using graphene oxide fabricated by Hummers and Couette-Taylor flow methods

Yeojoon Yoon, Namgyu Kim, Chaehwi Lim, Junho Lee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention from researchers owing to its exceptional physicochemical properties. GO is typically synthesized through chemical oxidation followed by exfoliation processes. In this study, we employed the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method to produce GO. The Couette-Taylor flow method offers the advantage of shorter oxidation reaction times and reduced wastewater compared to the Hummers method. We conducted surface analysis (including scanning electron microscope(SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), Zeta potential, multiple-point Brunauer Emmett Teller(BET), and atomic force microscope(AFM)) to assess and compare the surface characteristics of GO. Our analysis revealed that GO synthesized using the Couette-Taylor flow method (GO/Taylor) exhibited smaller lateral sizes. Additionally, we performed Particle Size Distribution Analysis (PSA) to verify the particle distribution of GO. The mean particle sizes of GO produced via the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method were determined to be 49.87 μm and 28.97 μm, respectively. These differences in surface properties and particle sizes influenced the adsorption capacity of GO for dyes. Considering the polarity, Cationic dye (BV1) and anionic dye (RR141) were selected for our adsorption experiments based on their polarity. Furthermore, we employed kinetic and isotherm adsorption modeling to analyze the adsorption mechanism in detail.

Carbon TrendsVol. 19
Yonsei University (KR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Graphene research and applications
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.