Assessment and analysis of development risks under uncertainty: The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy development

• Renewable energy mitigates climate change and environmental good outstandingly. • A novel model for assessment renewable energy risks and strategies was proposed. • The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy systems. • Intensive verifications with other challenging approaches are discussed. • A case study is proposed to illustrate the rationality of the proposed model. Renewable energy (RE) is gaining great attention nowadays, as opposed to traditional energy, such as fossil fuels, which have various negative impacts and issues. RE faces multiple risks and challenges, so these risks need to be evaluated and mitigated such as technical risks, environmental risks, security risks, policy risks, and technological risks. This study proposed a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for assessing RE risks. The MCDM method is integrated with neutrosophic sets (NSs) to deal with inconsistent data in the evaluation process. Two MCDM methods are used in this study: Entropy and Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC). The neutrosophic entropy is used to compute the criteria weight, and the neutrosophic RAWEC method ranks the alternatives. This study applied the proposed method to two case studies. In the first case study, the RE risks are ranked. In the second case study, various strategies are proposed by blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and zero-trust to reduce RE risks. There are six main factors; 31 sub-factors and 19 risks are used in the first case study, and 19 factors and 20 strategies are used in the second case study. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the rank. The proposed methodology was compared with MCDM methods such as neutrosophic TOPSIS, neutrosophic VIKOR, and fuzzy CoCoSo. The results show various proposed strategies can reduce RE risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2025-02-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100371
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment and analysis of development risks under uncertainty: The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy development

Karam M. Sallam, Ibrahim Alrashdi, Mohamed Abdel‐Basset, Ahmed M. Ali
9 citations
Energy Nexus
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
3.27
article

Assessment and analysis of development risks under uncertainty: The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy development

Karam M. Sallam, Ibrahim Alrashdi, Mohamed Abdel‐Basset, Ahmed M. Ali
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Renewable energy mitigates climate change and environmental good outstandingly. • A novel model for assessment renewable energy risks and strategies was proposed. • The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy systems. • Intensive verifications with other challenging approaches are discussed. • A case study is proposed to illustrate the rationality of the proposed model. Renewable energy (RE) is gaining great attention nowadays, as opposed to traditional energy, such as fossil fuels, which have various negative impacts and issues. RE faces multiple risks and challenges, so these risks need to be evaluated and mitigated such as technical risks, environmental risks, security risks, policy risks, and technological risks. This study proposed a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for assessing RE risks. The MCDM method is integrated with neutrosophic sets (NSs) to deal with inconsistent data in the evaluation process. Two MCDM methods are used in this study: Entropy and Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC). The neutrosophic entropy is used to compute the criteria weight, and the neutrosophic RAWEC method ranks the alternatives. This study applied the proposed method to two case studies. In the first case study, the RE risks are ranked. In the second case study, various strategies are proposed by blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and zero-trust to reduce RE risks. There are six main factors; 31 sub-factors and 19 risks are used in the first case study, and 19 factors and 20 strategies are used in the second case study. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the rank. The proposed methodology was compared with MCDM methods such as neutrosophic TOPSIS, neutrosophic VIKOR, and fuzzy CoCoSo. The results show various proposed strategies can reduce RE risks.

Energy NexusVol. 17
Zagazig University (EG), Jouf University (SA), University of Sharjah (AE)
Al Jouf University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.