Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany

• Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) reflect societal values but are inherently non-neutral. • Analyzing distributive, procedural, and recognition justice provides deeper insights into CES. • The co-productive nature of CES reveals their collective, individual, and ambiguous character. • Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods enables a more holistic and just CES implementation. Urban projects based on Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) are increasingly developed through participatory and bottom-up processes aiming for a more just and equal supply of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). However, the concept of CES is shaped by underlying assumptions about valuation, governance structures, and power dynamics, which can lead to unequal access to and control over ES benefits. Furthermore, CES are often evaluated post BGI’s construction, focusing on distributive justice with limited scope for adjustments. This article investigates how pre-construction bottom-up processes shape the distribution and recognition of CES among communities and individuals. Using an Environmental Justice lens, it examines CES through three dimensions of justice simultaneously, namely distributional, recognition and procedural. This is tested for the case study of Ecovillage Hannover, an ecological housing project in Germany, developed through a bottom-up approach. After using qualitative and quantitative methods, the findings reveal that i.) the co-productive nature of CES influences their unequal distribution ii.) embracing trade-offs through discussions and confrontations is essential to address conflicting CES values; iii.) integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches supports a more holistic and just application of the CES framework. The study offers insights for public policies on the role of BGI in community-led housing projects, demonstrating how CES perceptions and justice considerations can guide more inclusive and sustainable outcomes, especially during early development stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-02-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101701
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany

Hug March, David Saurı́, Andrea Nóblega-Carriquiry, Jochen Hack
3 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany

Hug March, David Saurı́, Andrea Nóblega-Carriquiry, Jochen Hack
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) reflect societal values but are inherently non-neutral. • Analyzing distributive, procedural, and recognition justice provides deeper insights into CES. • The co-productive nature of CES reveals their collective, individual, and ambiguous character. • Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods enables a more holistic and just CES implementation. Urban projects based on Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) are increasingly developed through participatory and bottom-up processes aiming for a more just and equal supply of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). However, the concept of CES is shaped by underlying assumptions about valuation, governance structures, and power dynamics, which can lead to unequal access to and control over ES benefits. Furthermore, CES are often evaluated post BGI’s construction, focusing on distributive justice with limited scope for adjustments. This article investigates how pre-construction bottom-up processes shape the distribution and recognition of CES among communities and individuals. Using an Environmental Justice lens, it examines CES through three dimensions of justice simultaneously, namely distributional, recognition and procedural. This is tested for the case study of Ecovillage Hannover, an ecological housing project in Germany, developed through a bottom-up approach. After using qualitative and quantitative methods, the findings reveal that i.) the co-productive nature of CES influences their unequal distribution ii.) embracing trade-offs through discussions and confrontations is essential to address conflicting CES values; iii.) integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches supports a more holistic and just application of the CES framework. The study offers insights for public policies on the role of BGI in community-led housing projects, demonstrating how CES perceptions and justice considerations can guide more inclusive and sustainable outcomes, especially during early development stages.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 72
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.