Management Strategies for Occupational Health and Safety during Prevention Intervention Development

Background: Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) professionals, including managers and advisors, often face exclusion from key organizational decision-making processes, limiting their influence on workplace safety improvements. While prior research highlights the technical aspects of OHS roles, little attention has been given to the strategic approaches professionals use to navigate organizational challenges and influence safety systems effectively. Methods:This study was conducted through in-depth interviews with twelve OHS professionals from public and private sector organizations. Participants, comprising six OHS managers and six OHS advisors, had at least six years of experience. Data collection involved semi-structured and structured interviews, where participants provided insights into their responsibilities, strategic approaches, and organizational positioning. Thematic analysis using NVIVO software categorized strategies based on existing frameworks while identifying new approaches. An impact evaluation framework with seven levels was applied to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. Results: OHS professionals were motivated by personal experiences, a commitment to workplace safety, and the desire to drive organizational change. Their primary responsibilities included advising management, ensuring regulatory compliance, and maintaining OHS management systems. While most professionals operated at both strategic and operational levels, their focus was primarily on organizational and human-centered dimensions rather than technical aspects. Strategic approaches varied, with some relying on traditional compliance-based strategies, while others employed adaptive tactics, such as the “political reflective navigator” model, to influence workplace safety culture. Conclusion: The study highlights the diverse roles and strategies employed by OHS professionals to enhance workplace safety. Despite their marginalization in decision-making, those who adopt flexible, advocacy-driven strategies can exert significant influence on organizational safety practices. Future research should explore additional contextual factors affecting OHS professionals' strategic efficacy, particularly in different industry settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.6320
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management Strategies for Occupational Health and Safety during Prevention Intervention Development

Mohamed A. Ismail, Bader Alsharari, Mohammed Alotaibi, Mona Alotaibi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Ecohumanism
Occupational Health and Safety Research
0.45
article

Management Strategies for Occupational Health and Safety during Prevention Intervention Development

Mohamed A. Ismail, Bader Alsharari, Mohammed Alotaibi, Mona Alotaibi, Rayan Abdulhamed yuldash Narql, Ghaliah abdu ali Majrashi, HAMZAH FAHAD AL AMRI, Abdul Mohsen Abdul Rahman Muhammad Al Sharari, Jawaher said saad Alshahrani, Ohud Ghulayyim Alghamdi, Saeed Yahya saeed al abu hamamah, WEJDAN ALI BIN AMER ALTAMIMI, Amaal Mugeb Alotibi, HASAN HUSSAIN ALBUGHULI
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) professionals, including managers and advisors, often face exclusion from key organizational decision-making processes, limiting their influence on workplace safety improvements. While prior research highlights the technical aspects of OHS roles, little attention has been given to the strategic approaches professionals use to navigate organizational challenges and influence safety systems effectively. Methods:This study was conducted through in-depth interviews with twelve OHS professionals from public and private sector organizations. Participants, comprising six OHS managers and six OHS advisors, had at least six years of experience. Data collection involved semi-structured and structured interviews, where participants provided insights into their responsibilities, strategic approaches, and organizational positioning. Thematic analysis using NVIVO software categorized strategies based on existing frameworks while identifying new approaches. An impact evaluation framework with seven levels was applied to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. Results: OHS professionals were motivated by personal experiences, a commitment to workplace safety, and the desire to drive organizational change. Their primary responsibilities included advising management, ensuring regulatory compliance, and maintaining OHS management systems. While most professionals operated at both strategic and operational levels, their focus was primarily on organizational and human-centered dimensions rather than technical aspects. Strategic approaches varied, with some relying on traditional compliance-based strategies, while others employed adaptive tactics, such as the “political reflective navigator” model, to influence workplace safety culture. Conclusion: The study highlights the diverse roles and strategies employed by OHS professionals to enhance workplace safety. Despite their marginalization in decision-making, those who adopt flexible, advocacy-driven strategies can exert significant influence on organizational safety practices. Future research should explore additional contextual factors affecting OHS professionals' strategic efficacy, particularly in different industry settings.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 3(8)
American Nurses Association (US), University of Buea (CM), Universidad de Granada (ES), Al Yarmouk University College (IQ), Services Hospital (PK), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Universitas Islam Al-Azhar Mataram (ID), Array Information Technology (United States) (US), Security Forces Hospital (SA), King Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), Directorate General of Health Services (BD), King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.