A descriptive study of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian and their morphological types

The comparison of language systems in different language families is still a topic worth in-depth research. Both Chinese and Indonesian are languages with large population in the world, belonging to the language families of Sino-Tibetan and Austronesian, respectively. However, the comparison of their morphologies has received less attention, and scholars hold different views on their morphological types. This study delves into the types of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian, analysing their similarities and differences to deepen our understanding of the basic morphological types in both languages. Descriptive qualitative approach, current literature and document analysis are the main research method applied in this study. The findings reveal that Chinese and Indonesian affixes are mainly derivational, both have sound changes and the same mechanism of borrowed affixes. However, both Chinese and Indonesian exhibit unique types of affixation, varying in the number of allomorphs and the patterns of sound changes across different affixes; some Chinese affixes can be a root, and some of their quasi affixes are expressed in a free word in Indonesian. Analysing the morphological process of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian can further elucidate their basic morphological types. Chinese is a typical isolating language, but its affixes have certain characteristics of agglutinating language. Indonesian can be regarded as an isolating language in which its affixes have abundant characteristics of agglutinating language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74904
Primary Topic
English Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A descriptive study of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian and their morphological types

Yenny Marlim
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
English Language Learning and Teaching
article

A descriptive study of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian and their morphological types

Yenny Marlim
article en

Abstract

The comparison of language systems in different language families is still a topic worth in-depth research. Both Chinese and Indonesian are languages with large population in the world, belonging to the language families of Sino-Tibetan and Austronesian, respectively. However, the comparison of their morphologies has received less attention, and scholars hold different views on their morphological types. This study delves into the types of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian, analysing their similarities and differences to deepen our understanding of the basic morphological types in both languages. Descriptive qualitative approach, current literature and document analysis are the main research method applied in this study. The findings reveal that Chinese and Indonesian affixes are mainly derivational, both have sound changes and the same mechanism of borrowed affixes. However, both Chinese and Indonesian exhibit unique types of affixation, varying in the number of allomorphs and the patterns of sound changes across different affixes; some Chinese affixes can be a root, and some of their quasi affixes are expressed in a free word in Indonesian. Analysing the morphological process of affixation in Chinese and Indonesian can further elucidate their basic morphological types. Chinese is a typical isolating language, but its affixes have certain characteristics of agglutinating language. Indonesian can be regarded as an isolating language in which its affixes have abundant characteristics of agglutinating language.

Indonesian Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 14(2)
Wuchang University of Technology (CN)
Wuhan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
English Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.