Invisible Participation: Patients with Oncological and Rare Diseases in Russia

Scholars have paid much attention to patients’ participation in healthcare, such as engagement in activities developed by healthcare providers and involvement in patient activism. Our study draws attention to a type of patient participation that has attracted less academic interest—patients’ mundane practices of survival. Bringing together insights from political anthropology, science and technology studies, and the sociology of health, we argue that patients’ everyday practices significantly shape care provision, and thus must be understood as participation in healthcare. We coin the term “invisible participation” to highlight that while patients’ everyday practices constitute participation in their own right, this form of participation remains invisible for scientists, policymakers, and patients themselves. Through ethnographically inspired qualitative study of the practices of patients with oncological and rare diseases in Russia, we distinguish three types of practices that constitute invisible participation: navigating healthcare, filling in for unavailable doctors, and providing access to medicines. We discuss the implications of our findings for both democratic and non-democratic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology & Human Values
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241310741
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invisible Participation: Patients with Oncological and Rare Diseases in Russia

Olga Temina, Olga Zvonareva, Klasien Horstman
1 citations
Science Technology & Human Values
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
1.16
article

Invisible Participation: Patients with Oncological and Rare Diseases in Russia

Olga Temina, Olga Zvonareva, Klasien Horstman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scholars have paid much attention to patients’ participation in healthcare, such as engagement in activities developed by healthcare providers and involvement in patient activism. Our study draws attention to a type of patient participation that has attracted less academic interest—patients’ mundane practices of survival. Bringing together insights from political anthropology, science and technology studies, and the sociology of health, we argue that patients’ everyday practices significantly shape care provision, and thus must be understood as participation in healthcare. We coin the term “invisible participation” to highlight that while patients’ everyday practices constitute participation in their own right, this form of participation remains invisible for scientists, policymakers, and patients themselves. Through ethnographically inspired qualitative study of the practices of patients with oncological and rare diseases in Russia, we distinguish three types of practices that constitute invisible participation: navigating healthcare, filling in for unavailable doctors, and providing access to medicines. We discuss the implications of our findings for both democratic and non-democratic contexts.

Science Technology & Human ValuesVol. 50(3)
Maastricht University (NL)
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Invisible Participation: Patients with Oncological and Rare Diseases in Russia — Olga Temina, Olga Zvonareva, et al. · Science Technology & Human Values (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS