Multi‐Scale Intense Geoelectric and Geomagnetic Field Perturbations Observed After an Interplanetary Magnetic Field Turning

Abstract Intense geoelectric fields during geomagnetic storms generate geomagnetically induced currents in power grids and other infrastructure, necessitating an understanding of their causes, for example, through coordinated space and ground observations. This study investigates localized intense geoelectric ( E ) and geomagnetic ( B ) field perturbations following an Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) turning during a geomagnetic storm on 25 October 2011. Observations from EarthScope magnetotelluric sites in the upper Midwest United States revealed shorter period (1 min) ultra‐low‐frequency (ULF) waves superimposed on longer period (10 min) perturbations in both E and B fields. These sites, located at 19 hr magnetic local time and magnetic latitude, recorded large amplitude E and B perturbations. Ground‐based all‐sky imagers showed auroral brightening with sunward and poleward propagation, while upstream spacecraft linked the perturbations to an IMF turning and solar wind dynamic pressure impulse. The longer‐period E and B field perturbations likely stem from localized ionospheric currents tied to substorm auroral activity post‐IMF turning. The combination of ionospheric currents, ULF waves, and the Earth's varying conductivity produces intense geoelectric fields of 2 V/km in the upper Midwest. A comparison using input data and software compatible with the NOAA/USGS geoelectric field nowcast model revealed its limitations in capturing such events due to the temporal and spatial resolution of the underlying data. Using 1‐s geomagnetic field data can improve geoelectric field models by capturing short‐period and large spatial scale waves, although localized magnetic perturbations remain underestimated due to insufficient ground magnetometer density.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Weather
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw004046
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐Scale Intense Geoelectric and Geomagnetic Field Perturbations Observed After an Interplanetary Magnetic Field Turning

J. B. H. Baker, Greg Lucas, Ying Zou, Xueling Shi et al.
3 citations
Space Weather
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
3.46
article

Multi‐Scale Intense Geoelectric and Geomagnetic Field Perturbations Observed After an Interplanetary Magnetic Field Turning

J. B. H. Baker, Greg Lucas, Ying Zou, Xueling Shi, Michael D. Hartinger, V. Angelopoulos, Anna Kelbert, J. M. Weygand, E. Joshua Rigler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Intense geoelectric fields during geomagnetic storms generate geomagnetically induced currents in power grids and other infrastructure, necessitating an understanding of their causes, for example, through coordinated space and ground observations. This study investigates localized intense geoelectric ( E ) and geomagnetic ( B ) field perturbations following an Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) turning during a geomagnetic storm on 25 October 2011. Observations from EarthScope magnetotelluric sites in the upper Midwest United States revealed shorter period (1 min) ultra‐low‐frequency (ULF) waves superimposed on longer period (10 min) perturbations in both E and B fields. These sites, located at 19 hr magnetic local time and magnetic latitude, recorded large amplitude E and B perturbations. Ground‐based all‐sky imagers showed auroral brightening with sunward and poleward propagation, while upstream spacecraft linked the perturbations to an IMF turning and solar wind dynamic pressure impulse. The longer‐period E and B field perturbations likely stem from localized ionospheric currents tied to substorm auroral activity post‐IMF turning. The combination of ionospheric currents, ULF waves, and the Earth's varying conductivity produces intense geoelectric fields of 2 V/km in the upper Midwest. A comparison using input data and software compatible with the NOAA/USGS geoelectric field nowcast model revealed its limitations in capturing such events due to the temporal and spatial resolution of the underlying data. Using 1‐s geomagnetic field data can improve geoelectric field models by capturing short‐period and large spatial scale waves, although localized magnetic perturbations remain underestimated due to insufficient ground magnetometer density.

Space WeatherVol. 23(2)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), NSF NCAR High Altitude Observatory (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Space Science Institute (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), Virginia Tech (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Geological Survey
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.