Light competition affects how tree growth and survival respond to climate

Abstract Competition between individuals is a key process that drives tree growth and survival in forests. Ecological theories predict that the effect of competition should be weaker in stressful environments. However, quantitative studies have failed to reach a consensus on the direction of the interaction between climate and competition. In this study, we demonstrate that this interaction appears clearly when we explicitly focus on light competition. We analysed the effect of light competition on tree growth and survival along both temperature and aridity gradients for the 33 major European tree species. We collected forest inventories from nine European countries, encompassing over 1 million trees from Spain to Scandinavia. We used species‐specific crown allometric equations to connect this extensive database to the SamsaraLight ray tracing model and to calculate a tree‐based light competition index from the light intercepted by the tree crown. Within a given species' climatic niche, the effect of light competition on tree growth and survival decreased towards both the dry and cold margins, supporting the stress gradient hypothesis. Climate mainly affected tree growth in light, with slower growth in drier or colder conditions. In contrast, for survival, climate mainly affected trees in shade, with better survival in the dry or cold stress margins. Among species, the mean sensitivity of tree growth and survival to light competition decreased with increasing mean aridity niche and shade tolerance of the species. Synthesis. Our study emphasises the importance of considering species‐specific interactions between light competition and climate on tree growth and survival. The impact of climate change on an individual tree is likely to depend on its light competition status within the forest stand, as well as its species‐specific climatic niche and shade tolerance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecology
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14489
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Light competition affects how tree growth and survival respond to climate

Emil Cienciala, Paweł Hawryło, Vladimír Šebeň, Matija Klopčić et al.
7 citations
Journal of Ecology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
7.74
article

Light competition affects how tree growth and survival respond to climate

Emil Cienciala, Paweł Hawryło, Vladimír Šebeň, Matija Klopčić, Paloma Ruiz‐Benito, Aleksi Lehtonen, Laura Touzot, Benoı̂t Courbaud, Jarosław Socha, Georges Künstler, Nathéo Beauchamp, Jonas Dahlgren, Miguel Á. Zavala
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Competition between individuals is a key process that drives tree growth and survival in forests. Ecological theories predict that the effect of competition should be weaker in stressful environments. However, quantitative studies have failed to reach a consensus on the direction of the interaction between climate and competition. In this study, we demonstrate that this interaction appears clearly when we explicitly focus on light competition. We analysed the effect of light competition on tree growth and survival along both temperature and aridity gradients for the 33 major European tree species. We collected forest inventories from nine European countries, encompassing over 1 million trees from Spain to Scandinavia. We used species‐specific crown allometric equations to connect this extensive database to the SamsaraLight ray tracing model and to calculate a tree‐based light competition index from the light intercepted by the tree crown. Within a given species' climatic niche, the effect of light competition on tree growth and survival decreased towards both the dry and cold margins, supporting the stress gradient hypothesis. Climate mainly affected tree growth in light, with slower growth in drier or colder conditions. In contrast, for survival, climate mainly affected trees in shade, with better survival in the dry or cold stress margins. Among species, the mean sensitivity of tree growth and survival to light competition decreased with increasing mean aridity niche and shade tolerance of the species. Synthesis. Our study emphasises the importance of considering species‐specific interactions between light competition and climate on tree growth and survival. The impact of climate change on an individual tree is likely to depend on its light competition status within the forest stand, as well as its species‐specific climatic niche and shade tolerance.

Journal of EcologyVol. 113(3)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research (CZ), National Forest Centre (SK), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Université Grenoble Alpes, European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja, Ministrstvo za Izobraževanje, Znanost in Šport, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, U.S. Forest Service, Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju, FP7 Environment
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.