Researcher views on returning results from multi-omics data to research participants: insights from The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) Study

Overall, researchers expressed positive attitudes toward multi-omic return of results in principle, particularly if medically actionable. However, competing ethical considerations, logistical constraints, and need for more external guidance were raised as key implementation concerns. Future studies should consider views and experiences of other relevant stakeholders, specifically clinical genomics professionals and study participants, regarding the clinical utility of multi-omics information and multi-omics results return.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01174-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researcher views on returning results from multi-omics data to research participants: insights from The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) Study

Kelly E. Ormond, Caroline Stanclift, Jennefer N. Carter, Chloe M. Reuter et al.
3 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
3.60
article

Researcher views on returning results from multi-omics data to research participants: insights from The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) Study

Kelly E. Ormond, Caroline Stanclift, Jennefer N. Carter, Chloe M. Reuter, Matthew Thomas Wheeler, Maléne E. Lindholm, Kathleen Murphy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Overall, researchers expressed positive attitudes toward multi-omic return of results in principle, particularly if medically actionable. However, competing ethical considerations, logistical constraints, and need for more external guidance were raised as key implementation concerns. Future studies should consider views and experiences of other relevant stakeholders, specifically clinical genomics professionals and study participants, regarding the clinical utility of multi-omics information and multi-omics results return.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 26(1)
ETH Zurich (CH), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Common Fund
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.