Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging

Abstract While habitat loss and hunting remain the major drivers of biodiversity declines, sublethal disturbances, such as human presence, recreation, and noise also impact wildlife. In response, wildlife often adjust their spatiotemporal behaviors. This study assesses how terrestrial wildlife responds to sublethal disturbances associated with sustainable logging activities. Using camera traps, we conducted a 2‐year continuous survey of two logging compartments within an active, sustainably logged forest reserve in central Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. The survey encompassed periods before, during, and after logging activities, and we obtained daily felling data. Using generalized linear mixed models, we assessed the impact of logging on the spatiotemporal activity of 10 terrestrial mammal and galliform species, considering spatial factors like logging intensity and distance from logging activity, and temporal factors such as days since logging. Four species had a significant and strong response to logging intensity, with varied directions of effect. Only for one species, the response to logging intensity was mediated by time since logging. Though only descriptive, we found no evidence of diel activity shifts, and, for all other species detected during our survey, general patterns in the number of records across each logging period were mixed. Our results highlight the variable and species‐specific responses to logging activity. At a local scale, many species exhibit resilience in their spatiotemporal activity patterns, but for affected species, the effects of logging appear to linger over time. The overall limited response could be due to the relatively low disturbance nature of reduced‐impact logging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70185
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging

Azrie Petrus, Roshan Guharajan, Seth T. Wong, Johnny Kissing et al.
3 citations
Ecosphere
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
article

Terrestrial wildlife shows limited response in spatiotemporal activity to logging

Azrie Petrus, Roshan Guharajan, Seth T. Wong, Johnny Kissing, Rahel Sollmann, Andreas Wilting, Jaffly Jubili, Peter Lagan, Robert C. Ong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract While habitat loss and hunting remain the major drivers of biodiversity declines, sublethal disturbances, such as human presence, recreation, and noise also impact wildlife. In response, wildlife often adjust their spatiotemporal behaviors. This study assesses how terrestrial wildlife responds to sublethal disturbances associated with sustainable logging activities. Using camera traps, we conducted a 2‐year continuous survey of two logging compartments within an active, sustainably logged forest reserve in central Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. The survey encompassed periods before, during, and after logging activities, and we obtained daily felling data. Using generalized linear mixed models, we assessed the impact of logging on the spatiotemporal activity of 10 terrestrial mammal and galliform species, considering spatial factors like logging intensity and distance from logging activity, and temporal factors such as days since logging. Four species had a significant and strong response to logging intensity, with varied directions of effect. Only for one species, the response to logging intensity was mediated by time since logging. Though only descriptive, we found no evidence of diel activity shifts, and, for all other species detected during our survey, general patterns in the number of records across each logging period were mixed. Our results highlight the variable and species‐specific responses to logging activity. At a local scale, many species exhibit resilience in their spatiotemporal activity patterns, but for affected species, the effects of logging appear to linger over time. The overall limited response could be due to the relatively low disturbance nature of reduced‐impact logging.

EcosphereVol. 16(2)
Sabah Forestry Department (MY), Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Panthera, International Association for Bear Research and Management, Cleveland Zoological Society, Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.