Trends in mental health care and telehealth use across area deprivation: An analysis of electronic health records from 2016 to 2024

While telehealth may improve access to healthcare for some, it may also widen gaps in access across different economic groups. Using electronic health records for outpatient mental health care of patients with depression in a large US academic health system, we assessed changes in mental health care utilization from 2016 to 2024 (primary care: <i>n</i> = 42,640 patients, 270,754 visits; psychiatry: <i>n</i> = 12,846 patients, 336,918 visits) and odds of using telehealth relative to in-person care from 2020 to 2024, across national area deprivation index (ADI) percentiles. We found that over 3 years prepandemic (July 2016-June 2019), the volume of mental health care delivered to patients from low-deprivation areas (1st-25th national ADI percentile) was increasing at a steeper rate than for high-deprivation areas (76th-100th national ADI percentile). Visit volume changed rapidly at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and by July 2021 it was increased relative to prepandemic levels. From July 2021 to June 2024, volume of care declined for all deprivation groups, but at a more rapid rate for the high-deprivation group than the low-deprivation group. Further, on average from July 2020 to June 2024, the odds of receiving telehealth relative to in-person care were significantly higher for patients living in low deprivation rather than high-deprivation areas in both primary care and psychiatry. We did not find evidence of telehealth improving access to care for patients in high-deprivation areas. Differences in telehealth use may contribute to sustained disparities in access to mental health care across economic groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf016
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in mental health care and telehealth use across area deprivation: An analysis of electronic health records from 2016 to 2024

Catherine K. Ettman, Michael Albert, Theodore John Iwashyna, Carly Lupton‐Smith et al.
6 citations
PNAS Nexus
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
11.27
article

Trends in mental health care and telehealth use across area deprivation: An analysis of electronic health records from 2016 to 2024

Catherine K. Ettman, Michael Albert, Theodore John Iwashyna, Carly Lupton‐Smith, Ramin Mojtabai, Elizabeth T. Chin, Priya Dohlman, Stanislav Spivak, Grace Ringlein, Fernando S. Goes, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Peter P. Zandi, Elena Badillo Goicoechea, Jason Straub, Sazal Sthapit
article en
6 citations

Abstract

While telehealth may improve access to healthcare for some, it may also widen gaps in access across different economic groups. Using electronic health records for outpatient mental health care of patients with depression in a large US academic health system, we assessed changes in mental health care utilization from 2016 to 2024 (primary care: <i>n</i> = 42,640 patients, 270,754 visits; psychiatry: <i>n</i> = 12,846 patients, 336,918 visits) and odds of using telehealth relative to in-person care from 2020 to 2024, across national area deprivation index (ADI) percentiles. We found that over 3 years prepandemic (July 2016-June 2019), the volume of mental health care delivered to patients from low-deprivation areas (1st-25th national ADI percentile) was increasing at a steeper rate than for high-deprivation areas (76th-100th national ADI percentile). Visit volume changed rapidly at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and by July 2021 it was increased relative to prepandemic levels. From July 2021 to June 2024, volume of care declined for all deprivation groups, but at a more rapid rate for the high-deprivation group than the low-deprivation group. Further, on average from July 2020 to June 2024, the odds of receiving telehealth relative to in-person care were significantly higher for patients living in low deprivation rather than high-deprivation areas in both primary care and psychiatry. We did not find evidence of telehealth improving access to care for patients in high-deprivation areas. Differences in telehealth use may contribute to sustained disparities in access to mental health care across economic groups.

PNAS NexusVol. 4(2)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Duke University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Tulane Medical Center (US)
Johns Hopkins University, National Institute of Mental Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.