RCE-IFE: recursive cluster elimination with intra-cluster feature elimination

The computational and interpretational difficulties caused by the ever-increasing dimensionality of biological data generated by new technologies pose a significant challenge. Feature selection (FS) methods aim to reduce the dimension, and feature grouping has emerged as a foundation for FS techniques that seek to detect strong correlations among features and identify irrelevant features. In this work, we propose the Recursive Cluster Elimination with Intra-Cluster Feature Elimination (RCE-IFE) method that utilizes feature grouping and iterates grouping and elimination steps in a supervised context. We assess dimensionality reduction and discriminatory capabilities of RCE-IFE on various high-dimensional datasets from different biological domains. For a set of gene expression, microRNA (miRNA) expression, and methylation datasets, the performance of RCE-IFE is comparatively evaluated with RCE-IFE-SVM (the SVM-adapted version of RCE-IFE) and SVM-RCE. On average, RCE-IFE attains an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 among tested expression datasets with the fewest features and the shortest running time, while RCE-IFE-SVM (the SVM-adapted version of RCE-IFE) and SVM-RCE achieve similar AUCs of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. RCE-IFE and SVM-RCE yield AUCs of 0.79 and 0.68, respectively when averaged over seven different metagenomics datasets, with RCE-IFE significantly reducing feature subsets. Furthermore, RCE-IFE surpasses several state-of-the-art FS methods, such as Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR), Fast Correlation-Based Filter (FCBF), Information Gain (IG), Conditional Mutual Information Maximization (CMIM), SelectKBest (SKB), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), obtaining an average AUC of 0.76 on five gene expression datasets. Compared with a similar tool, Multi-stage, RCE-IFE gives a similar average accuracy rate of 89.27% using fewer features on four cancer-related datasets. The comparability of RCE-IFE is also verified with other biological domain knowledge-based Grouping-Scoring-Modeling (G-S-M) tools, including mirGediNET, 3Mint, and miRcorrNet. Additionally, the biological relevance of the selected features by RCE-IFE is evaluated. The proposed method also exhibits high consistency in terms of the selected features across multiple runs. Our experimental findings imply that RCE-IFE provides robust classifier performance and significantly reduces feature size while maintaining feature relevance and consistency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2528
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RCE-IFE: recursive cluster elimination with intra-cluster feature elimination

Cihan Kuzudisli, Burcu Bakır-Güngör, Bahjat F. Qaqish, Malik Yousef
3 citations
PeerJ Computer Science
Gene expression and cancer classification
2.42
article

RCE-IFE: recursive cluster elimination with intra-cluster feature elimination

Cihan Kuzudisli, Burcu Bakır-Güngör, Bahjat F. Qaqish, Malik Yousef
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The computational and interpretational difficulties caused by the ever-increasing dimensionality of biological data generated by new technologies pose a significant challenge. Feature selection (FS) methods aim to reduce the dimension, and feature grouping has emerged as a foundation for FS techniques that seek to detect strong correlations among features and identify irrelevant features. In this work, we propose the Recursive Cluster Elimination with Intra-Cluster Feature Elimination (RCE-IFE) method that utilizes feature grouping and iterates grouping and elimination steps in a supervised context. We assess dimensionality reduction and discriminatory capabilities of RCE-IFE on various high-dimensional datasets from different biological domains. For a set of gene expression, microRNA (miRNA) expression, and methylation datasets, the performance of RCE-IFE is comparatively evaluated with RCE-IFE-SVM (the SVM-adapted version of RCE-IFE) and SVM-RCE. On average, RCE-IFE attains an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 among tested expression datasets with the fewest features and the shortest running time, while RCE-IFE-SVM (the SVM-adapted version of RCE-IFE) and SVM-RCE achieve similar AUCs of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. RCE-IFE and SVM-RCE yield AUCs of 0.79 and 0.68, respectively when averaged over seven different metagenomics datasets, with RCE-IFE significantly reducing feature subsets. Furthermore, RCE-IFE surpasses several state-of-the-art FS methods, such as Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR), Fast Correlation-Based Filter (FCBF), Information Gain (IG), Conditional Mutual Information Maximization (CMIM), SelectKBest (SKB), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), obtaining an average AUC of 0.76 on five gene expression datasets. Compared with a similar tool, Multi-stage, RCE-IFE gives a similar average accuracy rate of 89.27% using fewer features on four cancer-related datasets. The comparability of RCE-IFE is also verified with other biological domain knowledge-based Grouping-Scoring-Modeling (G-S-M) tools, including mirGediNET, 3Mint, and miRcorrNet. Additionally, the biological relevance of the selected features by RCE-IFE is evaluated. The proposed method also exhibits high consistency in terms of the selected features across multiple runs. Our experimental findings imply that RCE-IFE provides robust classifier performance and significantly reduces feature size while maintaining feature relevance and consistency.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Zefat Academic College (IL), Hasan Kalyoncu University (TR), Abdullah Gül University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gene expression and cancer classification
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.