Estimating Mean and Variance of In-Plane Resistance of Masonry Walls Using Inaccurate Design-Code Models and Limited High-Fidelity Data

Analyzing uncertainty or estimating statistics of load resistance of structures is crucial for reliability-based code calibrations, forming the foundation for modern limit state design. While design-code models can be used to estimate the load resistance of masonry walls against in-plane (IP) loading, it is widely recognized that these models are inherently inaccurate due to their simplifications, assumptions, or empirical features. Therefore, employing them for uncertainty analysis or statistics estimation can be challenging. On the other hand, detailed mechanics-based finite-element (FE) models and physical experimental tests are typically more accurate. Nevertheless, their application for uncertainty analysis or statistic estimation is often impractical due to their high computational or economic cost. To address this challenge, this study introduces improved estimators for mean and variance of the IP resistance of masonry walls after considering parameter uncertainties, by leveraging efficient design-code models and limited high-fidelity data generated from detailed FE models. In the proposed estimators, a large number of design-code model evaluations are introduced to improve computational efficiency, while only a limited number of FE model evaluations are integrated to ensure accuracy. Three case studies are presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed estimators: one on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and two on reinforced masonry (RM) walls. The results indicate that design-code model-based estimators exhibit large bias, and compared to the estimators that solely rely on the FE model, the proposed estimators achieve higher accuracy given the same computational budget.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-13920
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Mean and Variance of In-Plane Resistance of Masonry Walls Using Inaccurate Design-Code Models and Limited High-Fidelity Data

Bowen Zeng, Yong Li
Journal of Structural Engineering
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Estimating Mean and Variance of In-Plane Resistance of Masonry Walls Using Inaccurate Design-Code Models and Limited High-Fidelity Data

Bowen Zeng, Yong Li
article en

Abstract

Analyzing uncertainty or estimating statistics of load resistance of structures is crucial for reliability-based code calibrations, forming the foundation for modern limit state design. While design-code models can be used to estimate the load resistance of masonry walls against in-plane (IP) loading, it is widely recognized that these models are inherently inaccurate due to their simplifications, assumptions, or empirical features. Therefore, employing them for uncertainty analysis or statistics estimation can be challenging. On the other hand, detailed mechanics-based finite-element (FE) models and physical experimental tests are typically more accurate. Nevertheless, their application for uncertainty analysis or statistic estimation is often impractical due to their high computational or economic cost. To address this challenge, this study introduces improved estimators for mean and variance of the IP resistance of masonry walls after considering parameter uncertainties, by leveraging efficient design-code models and limited high-fidelity data generated from detailed FE models. In the proposed estimators, a large number of design-code model evaluations are introduced to improve computational efficiency, while only a limited number of FE model evaluations are integrated to ensure accuracy. Three case studies are presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed estimators: one on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and two on reinforced masonry (RM) walls. The results indicate that design-code model-based estimators exhibit large bias, and compared to the estimators that solely rely on the FE model, the proposed estimators achieve higher accuracy given the same computational budget.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(4)
University of Alberta (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.