Explain <i>with</i>, rather than explain <i>to</i>

Abstract Research about explanation processes is gaining relevance because of the increased popularity of artificial systems required to explain their function or outcome. Following an interactive approach, not only explainers, but also explainees contribute to successful interactions. However, little is known about how explainees actively guide explanation processes and how their involvement relates to learning. We explored the occurrence and type of explainees’ questions in 20 adult — adult explanation dialogues about unknown present and absent objects. Crucially, we related the question types to the explainees’ subsequent recall of the unknown object labels. We found that explainees asked different types of questions, especially about the object’s label and facts. Questions about the object’s function were asked more when objects were present. In addition, requests for labelling were linked to better recall. The results contribute to designing explainable AI that aims to provide relevant and adaptive explanations and to further experimental approaches to study explanations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.23019.fis
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explain with, rather than explain to

Gabriella Vigliocco, Ed Donnellan, Katharina J. Rohlfing, Angela Grimminger et al.
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Explain with, rather than explain to

Gabriella Vigliocco, Ed Donnellan, Katharina J. Rohlfing, Angela Grimminger, Josephine B. Fisher, Yan Gu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research about explanation processes is gaining relevance because of the increased popularity of artificial systems required to explain their function or outcome. Following an interactive approach, not only explainers, but also explainees contribute to successful interactions. However, little is known about how explainees actively guide explanation processes and how their involvement relates to learning. We explored the occurrence and type of explainees’ questions in 20 adult — adult explanation dialogues about unknown present and absent objects. Crucially, we related the question types to the explainees’ subsequent recall of the unknown object labels. We found that explainees asked different types of questions, especially about the object’s label and facts. Questions about the object’s function were asked more when objects were present. In addition, requests for labelling were linked to better recall. The results contribute to designing explainable AI that aims to provide relevant and adaptive explanations and to further experimental approaches to study explanations.

Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsVol. 25(2)
University of Essex (GB), Paderborn University (DE), Maastricht University (NL), University of Warwick (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explain <i>with</i>, rather than explain <i>to</i> — Gabriella Vigliocco, Ed Donnellan, et al. · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS