The Effect of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Industrial Employment in Sweden

Abstract In this paper, we empirically investigate how environmental protection expenditures affect sector-level employment within manufacturing industries, using detailed firm-level data for Sweden for the years 2002–2021. We use a structural model that allows for a decomposition of the total employment effect of environmental protection expenditures within a sector into a cost effect, a factor shift effect, and a demand effect. We add to previous literature by using instrumental variables in our empirical framework, to account for endogenous environmental spending stemming from, e.g., corporate social responsibility and self-regulation. Our results reveal that increased environmental protection expenditures generally have no statistically significant effect on employment among the sectors studied, with the paper and pulp sector being the exception, showing non-negligible negative effects on employment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-00961-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Industrial Employment in Sweden

Tommy Lundgren, Moriah Bostian, Mattias Vesterberg, Golnaz Amjadi et al.
2 citations
Environmental and Resource Economics
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

The Effect of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Industrial Employment in Sweden

Tommy Lundgren, Moriah Bostian, Mattias Vesterberg, Golnaz Amjadi, Hanna Lindström
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we empirically investigate how environmental protection expenditures affect sector-level employment within manufacturing industries, using detailed firm-level data for Sweden for the years 2002–2021. We use a structural model that allows for a decomposition of the total employment effect of environmental protection expenditures within a sector into a cost effect, a factor shift effect, and a demand effect. We add to previous literature by using instrumental variables in our empirical framework, to account for endogenous environmental spending stemming from, e.g., corporate social responsibility and self-regulation. Our results reveal that increased environmental protection expenditures generally have no statistically significant effect on employment among the sectors studied, with the paper and pulp sector being the exception, showing non-negligible negative effects on employment.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 88(4)
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (FR), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Lewis & Clark College (US), Umeå University (SE)
Norges Forskningsråd, Göteborgs Universitet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.