Income, demand and privatization

Abstract The question raised in this paper is whether and how some core features of income distribution, e.g. the income levels or income inequality, should be relevant in the decision to privatize public firms. The paper provides a first answer in the framework of mixed oligopoly theory. In particular, we show that the scope for privatization is widened when the market is poorer, and when incomes become more concentrated. These unexpected results are accounted for in terms of the way distributional shocks alter the allocative inefficiency of imperfectly competitive markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-025-00899-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income, demand and privatization

Alessandra Chirco, Caterina Colombo, Corrado Benassi
1 citations
Journal of Economics
Economic theories and models
3.13
article

Income, demand and privatization

Alessandra Chirco, Caterina Colombo, Corrado Benassi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The question raised in this paper is whether and how some core features of income distribution, e.g. the income levels or income inequality, should be relevant in the decision to privatize public firms. The paper provides a first answer in the framework of mixed oligopoly theory. In particular, we show that the scope for privatization is widened when the market is poorer, and when incomes become more concentrated. These unexpected results are accounted for in terms of the way distributional shocks alter the allocative inefficiency of imperfectly competitive markets.

Journal of EconomicsVol. 145(2)
University of Salento (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Università di Bologna
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Economic theories and models
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.