Prevalence of Adverse Events Reported Following the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines in Bahia State, Brazil, from 2021 to 2022

<b>Background</b>: Despite adverse events following immunization (AEFI) being well described in vaccine trials, there is a need to produce more real-world data on events supposedly attributed to vaccination against COVID-19. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of AEFI in the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines in the state of Brazil and to verify whether such events differ among the types of vaccines offered in this country. <b>Methods</b>: A population-based study using linked administrative data on vaccine registry and adverse events following immunization in 2021 and 2022. The study included 10,169,378 individuals aged 18 or over who lived in Bahia and received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines. We calculated AEFI prevalence and verified differences among vaccines by logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted by sex and age group prevalence ratio (PR). <b>Results</b>: The prevalence of AEFI was 74.3 per 100,000 doses applied, with a higher rate of nonserious events, mainly following the ChAdOx1-S. More than two-thirds of these adverse effects occurred in women, and almost half were between 30 and 49 years old. The individuals who received ChAdOx1-S had a 125% higher prevalence than those who received CoronaVac. Those who received BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S had a 71% and 58%, respectively, lower prevalence of AEFI than those who received CoronaVac. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of vaccines against COVID-19 has proven to be positive and effective in combating SARS-CoV-2, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality from the disease. We cannot deny the presence of adverse events in the context of vaccination. However, the vaccines have proven to be safe and reliable. The results of this study offer relevant data that can contribute to the qualification of AEFI pharmacovigilance in Brazil and worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Adverse Events Reported Following the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines in Bahia State, Brazil, from 2021 to 2022

Rita Carvalho-Sauer, Maria Yury Ichihara, Maria Glória Teixeira, Caroline Tianeze de Castro et al.
1 citations
Vaccines
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
article

Prevalence of Adverse Events Reported Following the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines in Bahia State, Brazil, from 2021 to 2022

Rita Carvalho-Sauer, Maria Yury Ichihara, Maria Glória Teixeira, Caroline Tianeze de Castro, Maria da Conceição Nascimento Costa, Enny S. Paixão, Ramon da Costa Saavedra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Despite adverse events following immunization (AEFI) being well described in vaccine trials, there is a need to produce more real-world data on events supposedly attributed to vaccination against COVID-19. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of AEFI in the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines in the state of Brazil and to verify whether such events differ among the types of vaccines offered in this country. <b>Methods</b>: A population-based study using linked administrative data on vaccine registry and adverse events following immunization in 2021 and 2022. The study included 10,169,378 individuals aged 18 or over who lived in Bahia and received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines. We calculated AEFI prevalence and verified differences among vaccines by logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted by sex and age group prevalence ratio (PR). <b>Results</b>: The prevalence of AEFI was 74.3 per 100,000 doses applied, with a higher rate of nonserious events, mainly following the ChAdOx1-S. More than two-thirds of these adverse effects occurred in women, and almost half were between 30 and 49 years old. The individuals who received ChAdOx1-S had a 125% higher prevalence than those who received CoronaVac. Those who received BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S had a 71% and 58%, respectively, lower prevalence of AEFI than those who received CoronaVac. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of vaccines against COVID-19 has proven to be positive and effective in combating SARS-CoV-2, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality from the disease. We cannot deny the presence of adverse events in the context of vaccination. However, the vaccines have proven to be safe and reliable. The results of this study offer relevant data that can contribute to the qualification of AEFI pharmacovigilance in Brazil and worldwide.

VaccinesVol. 13(2)
University of London (GB), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Universidade do Estado da Bahia (BR), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.