Does an Economic Profit Strategy Outperform the Market? A Long-Term Study Using EVA-Style Analysis

Our long-term performance study on economic profit over the past quarter century reveals that economic value added (EVA) still matters. An EVA-style strategy outperforms the market by providing higher risk-adjusted returns compared to large-cap benchmarks, including the S&P 500 and Russell 1000. Our performance assessment reveals that the positive EVA styles outperform the negative EVA styles in terms of absolute returns and risk-adjusted returns. As such, the positive EVA styles provide relatively attractive returns and may serve as a natural portfolio hedge with below-average systematic risk. Our multifactor regression tests using Fama–French methods reveal that an EVA-style effect remains in asset returns because the alphas are significant across the EVA styles. We note some interesting return differences and a structural break that occurred during the Global Financial Crisis. We also modify the traditional investment strategy recommendations for EVA-style analysis to better reflect the empirical results observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2025.1.685
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does an Economic Profit Strategy Outperform the Market? A Long-Term Study Using EVA-Style Analysis

James L. Grant, Emery A. Trahan, Atreya Chakraborty, Li Ai
2 citations
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
2.23
article

Does an Economic Profit Strategy Outperform the Market? A Long-Term Study Using EVA-Style Analysis

James L. Grant, Emery A. Trahan, Atreya Chakraborty, Li Ai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Our long-term performance study on economic profit over the past quarter century reveals that economic value added (EVA) still matters. An EVA-style strategy outperforms the market by providing higher risk-adjusted returns compared to large-cap benchmarks, including the S&P 500 and Russell 1000. Our performance assessment reveals that the positive EVA styles outperform the negative EVA styles in terms of absolute returns and risk-adjusted returns. As such, the positive EVA styles provide relatively attractive returns and may serve as a natural portfolio hedge with below-average systematic risk. Our multifactor regression tests using Fama–French methods reveal that an EVA-style effect remains in asset returns because the alphas are significant across the EVA styles. We note some interesting return differences and a structural break that occurred during the Global Financial Crisis. We also modify the traditional investment strategy recommendations for EVA-style analysis to better reflect the empirical results observed.

The Journal of Portfolio ManagementVol. 51(6)
Northeastern University (US), Winthrop University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Eastern University (BD)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.