Assessment of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants using risk stratification score

Objectives: Preterm birth, defined as delivery occurring before 37 weeks gestation, poses a significant public health challenge, as an increasing number of infants who survive face neurodevelopmental disabilities. Preterm infants face various health challenges, including anaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, feeding and respiratory difficulties, retinopathy and intracranial haemorrhage, which often lead to long-term cognitive, learning and behavioural impairments due to structural brain abnormalities. (1) To study risk stratification tools based on intrauterine and neonate insult. (2) To study and predict major neuro-developmental disability like cerebral palsy, mental retardation, blindness, deafness at 1 year of age. Material and Methods: The study included 30 preterm infants, categorised by risk levels, after obtaining ethical clearance and parental consent. Developmental follow-up assessments were adjusted for prematurity and conducted using tools such as the Amiel-Tison angle (ATA), scarf sign, Denver developmental screening test (DDST) and Vineland social maturity scale (VSMS). Visual and hearing assessments were checked for retinopathy and deafness. Primary outcomes at 1 year included death or major neurodevelopmental delays, such as cerebral palsy, mental impairment, blindness and profound hearing loss. Results: In this study of 30 preterm infants, 83% weighed over 1.5 kg with a mean birth weight of 1.73 kg, and amongst those under 1.5 kg, 80% had abnormal developmental outcomes. The mean gestational age was 32 ± 1 weeks. Major neurodevelopmental delays (NDD), including cerebral palsy and global developmental delay, was observed in 16.6% of the infants, while 30% experienced minor NDD. Preterms with major NDD had higher intervention needs, with 40% requiring positive pressure ventilation and intubation, and 20% requiring chest compressions, 26.6% having abnormal ATAs. Statistically significant perinatal risk factors for poor neurodevelopmental outcomes included extreme prematurity (≤32 weeks), birth weight (<1.7 kg), need for resuscitation and prolonged ventilation (>7 days). Conclusion: The study identified extreme prematurity, low birth weight, need for resuscitation and prolonged ventilation as key predictors of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Infants were stratified into low and high-risk groups to plan follow-up intensity and early intervention. Tools such as ATA, DDST, and VSMS aid in the early detection of neurodevelopmental disabilities, emphasising the importance of standardised follow-up programmes in neonatal units to improve outcomes for high-risk infants.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Karnataka Pediatric Journal
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/kpj_45_2024
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants using risk stratification score

Sharanagouda Patil, Akshay Patil, Roopa Mangshetty, Nikita Deepak Nemadi
Karnataka Pediatric Journal
Infant Development and Preterm Care
article

Assessment of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants using risk stratification score

Sharanagouda Patil, Akshay Patil, Roopa Mangshetty, Nikita Deepak Nemadi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Preterm birth, defined as delivery occurring before 37 weeks gestation, poses a significant public health challenge, as an increasing number of infants who survive face neurodevelopmental disabilities. Preterm infants face various health challenges, including anaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, feeding and respiratory difficulties, retinopathy and intracranial haemorrhage, which often lead to long-term cognitive, learning and behavioural impairments due to structural brain abnormalities. (1) To study risk stratification tools based on intrauterine and neonate insult. (2) To study and predict major neuro-developmental disability like cerebral palsy, mental retardation, blindness, deafness at 1 year of age. Material and Methods: The study included 30 preterm infants, categorised by risk levels, after obtaining ethical clearance and parental consent. Developmental follow-up assessments were adjusted for prematurity and conducted using tools such as the Amiel-Tison angle (ATA), scarf sign, Denver developmental screening test (DDST) and Vineland social maturity scale (VSMS). Visual and hearing assessments were checked for retinopathy and deafness. Primary outcomes at 1 year included death or major neurodevelopmental delays, such as cerebral palsy, mental impairment, blindness and profound hearing loss. Results: In this study of 30 preterm infants, 83% weighed over 1.5 kg with a mean birth weight of 1.73 kg, and amongst those under 1.5 kg, 80% had abnormal developmental outcomes. The mean gestational age was 32 ± 1 weeks. Major neurodevelopmental delays (NDD), including cerebral palsy and global developmental delay, was observed in 16.6% of the infants, while 30% experienced minor NDD. Preterms with major NDD had higher intervention needs, with 40% requiring positive pressure ventilation and intubation, and 20% requiring chest compressions, 26.6% having abnormal ATAs. Statistically significant perinatal risk factors for poor neurodevelopmental outcomes included extreme prematurity (≤32 weeks), birth weight (<1.7 kg), need for resuscitation and prolonged ventilation (>7 days). Conclusion: The study identified extreme prematurity, low birth weight, need for resuscitation and prolonged ventilation as key predictors of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Infants were stratified into low and high-risk groups to plan follow-up intensity and early intervention. Tools such as ATA, DDST, and VSMS aid in the early detection of neurodevelopmental disabilities, emphasising the importance of standardised follow-up programmes in neonatal units to improve outcomes for high-risk infants.

Karnataka Pediatric JournalVol. 40
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.