Perception of Evaluators While Evaluating University Theory Answer Sheets: Cross-Sectional Virtual Survey

Background: Nursing is a profession in which student after completing their training programme and provides best care to the patients. This training will shape the student’s future and make it bright. This Profession makes a student’s more decision maker, critical thinker and deal with daily ethical challenges. An important and simultaneously difficult aspect of good examination preparation is obtaining a properly trained and well-motivated group of assessors. To effectively recruit and maintain cooperation with assessors, it is worth knowing their opinion. The main aim of conducting this survey is to know the opinion of evaluators while evaluating. Objective: To assess the perception of evaluators while evaluating university theory answer sheets and to find out the association between the perception of evaluators with their selected demo-graphic variables. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire on evaluators who evaluate university theory answer sheets. This questionnaire consisted of 12 dichotomous questions about their perceptions. Purposive sampling technique was used to collect data. A total of 114 evaluators participated in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to find out the result. Finding: The Result showed that out of 114 evaluators, maximum 56.1% of evaluators were belongs to the age group of 31-40 years followed by 82.5% were females. Majority 93.9% were working in private area followed by 78.9% were qualified M.Sc (N). Majority 38.6% of evaluators were having 3 to7 years of experience. Majority of the evaluators has shown positive perception regarding all the aspects except the good or bad mood of the evaluator while checking the university theory answer sheets and checking previous theory sheet will affect the marking of the next answer sheets. Conclusion: The study concluded that the variables like age, gender, working area, qualification and years of experience were found to be statistically non-significant i.e., p<0.05.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Education and Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52711/2454-2660.2024.00048
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of Evaluators While Evaluating University Theory Answer Sheets: Cross-Sectional Virtual Survey

Namrata Bhatnagar, Bharti Sharma, Priya Sain
International Journal of Nursing Education and Research
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Perception of Evaluators While Evaluating University Theory Answer Sheets: Cross-Sectional Virtual Survey

Namrata Bhatnagar, Bharti Sharma, Priya Sain
article en

Abstract

Background: Nursing is a profession in which student after completing their training programme and provides best care to the patients. This training will shape the student’s future and make it bright. This Profession makes a student’s more decision maker, critical thinker and deal with daily ethical challenges. An important and simultaneously difficult aspect of good examination preparation is obtaining a properly trained and well-motivated group of assessors. To effectively recruit and maintain cooperation with assessors, it is worth knowing their opinion. The main aim of conducting this survey is to know the opinion of evaluators while evaluating. Objective: To assess the perception of evaluators while evaluating university theory answer sheets and to find out the association between the perception of evaluators with their selected demo-graphic variables. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire on evaluators who evaluate university theory answer sheets. This questionnaire consisted of 12 dichotomous questions about their perceptions. Purposive sampling technique was used to collect data. A total of 114 evaluators participated in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to find out the result. Finding: The Result showed that out of 114 evaluators, maximum 56.1% of evaluators were belongs to the age group of 31-40 years followed by 82.5% were females. Majority 93.9% were working in private area followed by 78.9% were qualified M.Sc (N). Majority 38.6% of evaluators were having 3 to7 years of experience. Majority of the evaluators has shown positive perception regarding all the aspects except the good or bad mood of the evaluator while checking the university theory answer sheets and checking previous theory sheet will affect the marking of the next answer sheets. Conclusion: The study concluded that the variables like age, gender, working area, qualification and years of experience were found to be statistically non-significant i.e., p<0.05.

International Journal of Nursing Education and Research
Institute of Mental Health (IN), American Association of Colleges of Nursing (US), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.