Are employer-initiated financial education programs effective for women? Insights for organizational training programs through stakeholder perceptions
Purpose This study aims to explore and unfold the problems in designing and delivering employer-initiated financial education programs (FEPs) from the perspective of working women who attend such programs. Design/methodology/approach The researchers conducted in-depth interviews and utilized an interpretive qualitative approach to explore the expectations and experiences of women employees regarding such programs. Findings The results of this study demonstrate that employer-led FEPs may not benefit women employees due to specific misaligned actions of both employers and employees at every stage, which make the programs ineffective. Research limitations/implications While this study encompasses women from varied age groups and marital statuses, the researchers acknowledge that the sample size is limited and represents a specific socioeconomic group. Practical implications The findings of this study have policy and practical implications for addressing perceived issues in FEPs initiated by employers for women employees. Originality/value The novel contributions of this study include suggesting a process model for building FEPs, highlighting the existing problems at each step in designing and delivering an FEP and expanding the application of Self-Determination Theory in FEPs.
Authors
- Rajasekharan Pillai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-2215)
- Hasirumane Venkatesh Mukesh
- M S Urmila (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-0987)
- Nandan Prabhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-317X)
Institutions
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- T A Pai Management Institute (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Industrial and Commercial Training
- Published
- 2025-02-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-08-2024-0084
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.82