Comparison of Multi-Tracked Running Gears in Terms of Obstacle Negotiation Capabilities

This paper concerns lightweight—up to 800 kg—UGVs (unmanned ground vehicles), where multi-tracked running gears are used to improve the obstacle negotiation performance. A comparison of four different multi-tracked systems and, for reference, classic tracked running gear is presented. Simulations in a multi-body dynamics program were performed, where running gear solutions overcame three typical obstacles and were assessed using a total of five effectiveness and functionality criteria. The simulation models took into account the variable track–ground contact surface. The ground parameters were validated by means of experimental tests for grassy terrain. In the results, the most advantageous solutions in each category are indicated, and design guidelines for increasing the obstacle-overcoming capabilities of multi-tracked UGVs are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041696
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Multi-Tracked Running Gears in Terms of Obstacle Negotiation Capabilities

Tomasz Muszyński, Daniela Szpaczyńska, Mirosław Przybysz
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
0.95
article

Comparison of Multi-Tracked Running Gears in Terms of Obstacle Negotiation Capabilities

Tomasz Muszyński, Daniela Szpaczyńska, Mirosław Przybysz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper concerns lightweight—up to 800 kg—UGVs (unmanned ground vehicles), where multi-tracked running gears are used to improve the obstacle negotiation performance. A comparison of four different multi-tracked systems and, for reference, classic tracked running gear is presented. Simulations in a multi-body dynamics program were performed, where running gear solutions overcame three typical obstacles and were assessed using a total of five effectiveness and functionality criteria. The simulation models took into account the variable track–ground contact surface. The ground parameters were validated by means of experimental tests for grassy terrain. In the results, the most advantageous solutions in each category are indicated, and design guidelines for increasing the obstacle-overcoming capabilities of multi-tracked UGVs are presented.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(4)
Military University of Technology in Warsaw (PL)
Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.