Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response

<b>Background:</b> Fremanezumab was the third CGRP antibody available in our hospital. This examination of our experience with fremanezumab is focused on identifying the predictors of response. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective observational study in which we included high-frequency episodic/chronic migraine (HF/CM) patients who were prescribed fremanezumab during the year 2023. Our research involved collecting data on their demographic details, diagnoses made, treatments received, prophylactic measures taken in the past, and any comorbid conditions present. The number of headaches was documented for one quarter prior to and after the initiation of fremanezumab. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-nine patients received fremanezumab (86.5% female, 45.8 ± 12.5 years old, 70.1% naive). The headache days decreased from 21.1 ± 7.6 to 12.4 ± 11.2 days during the initial three months of the treatment, and a total of 55 patients (61.8%) exhibited a response rate of ≥50%. Six out of ten patients refractory to erenumab for at least 6 months responded to fremanezumab. Totals of 17 and 26 patients had been treated at least with galcanezumab or erenumab. The elements influencing non-response were as follows: prior failure to respond to both erenumab and galcanezumab (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), HF/CM length (11.9 ± 7.1 years in non-responders vs. 5.8 ± 4.8 in responders; <i>p</i> < 0.001), the presence of fibromyalgia (<i>p</i> < 0.001), anxiety-depression (<i>p</i> < 0.001), an almost daily headache baseline (>28 days/month) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and analgesic overuse (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The response rate was unaffected by age and experience. After a multivariate logistic analysis, almost daily headaches (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a length of HF/CM > 6 years (<i>p</i> = 0.015), and anxiety-depression (<i>p</i> = 0.017) remained significant. Fremanezumab showed excellent tolerance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These real-life results confirm the efficacy of fremanezumab. The main factors associated with a lack of response were almost daily/daily headaches and a disease duration > 6 years. Half of the patients who failed to respond to erenumab improved on fremanezumab, making it sensible to switch to a treatment with a different mechanism of action, but trying a third anti-CGRP treatment in patients with no response to both a receptor-targeted and a ligand-targeted CGRP antibody hardly seems justifiable from our experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041054
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response

Julio Pascual, Vicente González‐Quintanilla, Gabriel Gárate, Jorge Madera et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Migraine and Headache Studies
4.41
article

Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response

Julio Pascual, Vicente González‐Quintanilla, Gabriel Gárate, Jorge Madera, Marcos Polanco, Julia Sánchez-Gudín
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Fremanezumab was the third CGRP antibody available in our hospital. This examination of our experience with fremanezumab is focused on identifying the predictors of response. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective observational study in which we included high-frequency episodic/chronic migraine (HF/CM) patients who were prescribed fremanezumab during the year 2023. Our research involved collecting data on their demographic details, diagnoses made, treatments received, prophylactic measures taken in the past, and any comorbid conditions present. The number of headaches was documented for one quarter prior to and after the initiation of fremanezumab. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-nine patients received fremanezumab (86.5% female, 45.8 ± 12.5 years old, 70.1% naive). The headache days decreased from 21.1 ± 7.6 to 12.4 ± 11.2 days during the initial three months of the treatment, and a total of 55 patients (61.8%) exhibited a response rate of ≥50%. Six out of ten patients refractory to erenumab for at least 6 months responded to fremanezumab. Totals of 17 and 26 patients had been treated at least with galcanezumab or erenumab. The elements influencing non-response were as follows: prior failure to respond to both erenumab and galcanezumab (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), HF/CM length (11.9 ± 7.1 years in non-responders vs. 5.8 ± 4.8 in responders; <i>p</i> < 0.001), the presence of fibromyalgia (<i>p</i> < 0.001), anxiety-depression (<i>p</i> < 0.001), an almost daily headache baseline (>28 days/month) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and analgesic overuse (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The response rate was unaffected by age and experience. After a multivariate logistic analysis, almost daily headaches (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a length of HF/CM > 6 years (<i>p</i> = 0.015), and anxiety-depression (<i>p</i> = 0.017) remained significant. Fremanezumab showed excellent tolerance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These real-life results confirm the efficacy of fremanezumab. The main factors associated with a lack of response were almost daily/daily headaches and a disease duration > 6 years. Half of the patients who failed to respond to erenumab improved on fremanezumab, making it sensible to switch to a treatment with a different mechanism of action, but trying a third anti-CGRP treatment in patients with no response to both a receptor-targeted and a ligand-targeted CGRP antibody hardly seems justifiable from our experience.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(4)
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Migraine and Headache Studies
4.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.