Forerunners vs. latecomers—institutional competition in the German federalism during the COVID crisis

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, political competition among the premiers of Germany’s 16 federal states intensified, with leaders striving to position themselves as proactive forerunners in managing the crisis. This paper examines the timing and determination of these state leaders in announcing, legislating, and enforcing COVID-19 policies, with attention to regional contexts and specific determinants influencing their actions. Utilizing multiple distinct databases, we conduct a survival analysis to assess each state’s political response in relative terms. Our findings reveal that state leaders who were early advocates in public announcements and discourse did not necessarily lead in formal legislation or enforcement of COVID-19 measures. This study provides a nuanced view of political competition in crisis governance, highlighting the divergence between political rhetoric and tangible policy action across Germany’s federal landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Law and Economics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-025-09832-4
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forerunners vs. latecomers—institutional competition in the German federalism during the COVID crisis

Oliver Budzinski, Juliane K. Mendelsohn, Thomas Grebel, Lukas Breide
European Journal of Law and Economics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Forerunners vs. latecomers—institutional competition in the German federalism during the COVID crisis

Oliver Budzinski, Juliane K. Mendelsohn, Thomas Grebel, Lukas Breide
article en

Abstract

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, political competition among the premiers of Germany’s 16 federal states intensified, with leaders striving to position themselves as proactive forerunners in managing the crisis. This paper examines the timing and determination of these state leaders in announcing, legislating, and enforcing COVID-19 policies, with attention to regional contexts and specific determinants influencing their actions. Utilizing multiple distinct databases, we conduct a survival analysis to assess each state’s political response in relative terms. Our findings reveal that state leaders who were early advocates in public announcements and discourse did not necessarily lead in formal legislation or enforcement of COVID-19 measures. This study provides a nuanced view of political competition in crisis governance, highlighting the divergence between political rhetoric and tangible policy action across Germany’s federal landscape.

European Journal of Law and EconomicsVol. 59(1)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Technische Universität Ilmenau
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.