Taxonomic refinement of Bacillus thuringiensis

<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> is the most important biological control agent against various agricultural pests. The bacterium taxonomically belongs to the <i>Bacillus cereus</i> group, which also contains human pathogenic species, e.g., <i>Bacillus anthracis</i>. Thus, precise identification and taxonomic delineation of candidate strains for agricultural usage is of high importance in terms of both public health and biosecurity. By October 2023, whole genome sequences (WGS) of 885 bacterial strains were labeled as <i>B. thuringiensis</i> in the NCBI GenBank database. This study investigates the taxonomic authenticity of those strains using DNA similarity indexes, i.e., average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH). All strains were compared with the type strain of <i>B. thuringiensis</i> ATCC 10972<sup>T</sup>. WGS-based phylotaxonomic investigations showed that out of 885 strains 803 strains authentically belonged to <i>B. thuringiensis</i> while 82 strains were mislabeled as <i>B. thuringiensis</i> having dDDH and ANI values less than the acceptable threshold of 70 and 95% respectively, for prokaryotic species definition in comparison with the <i>B. thuringiensis</i> type strain. Among these 82 mislabeled strains, 39 strains need to be reclassified within the <i>B. cereus</i> group in the species <i>B. anthracis</i> (33 strains), <i>Bacillus toyonensis</i> (five strains), and <i>Bacillus mycoides</i> (one strain). Furthermore, four strains were identified as <i>Bacillus tropicus</i> while one strain belonged to each of the species <i>Bacillus licheniformis</i>, <i>Bacillus paranthracis</i>, and <i>Bacillus weidmannii.</i> The remaining 36 strains did not match with any known <i>Bacillus</i> species nor the species of other bacterial genera, thus they could be assigned to hypothetical new species. Results of the present study, on the one hand, pave the way of comprehensive taxonomic refinements within <i>B. thuringiensis</i> species. On the other hand, highlight the role of taxonomic investigations in targeting authentic <i>B. thuringiensis</i> strains for biological control purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1518307
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insect Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxonomic refinement of Bacillus thuringiensis

Ebrahim Osdaghi, Hamid Abachi, Reza Talaei-Hassanloui, Sadegh Zarei et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Insect Resistance and Genetics
2.42
article

Taxonomic refinement of Bacillus thuringiensis

Ebrahim Osdaghi, Hamid Abachi, Reza Talaei-Hassanloui, Sadegh Zarei, Nagham Shiekh Suliman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> is the most important biological control agent against various agricultural pests. The bacterium taxonomically belongs to the <i>Bacillus cereus</i> group, which also contains human pathogenic species, e.g., <i>Bacillus anthracis</i>. Thus, precise identification and taxonomic delineation of candidate strains for agricultural usage is of high importance in terms of both public health and biosecurity. By October 2023, whole genome sequences (WGS) of 885 bacterial strains were labeled as <i>B. thuringiensis</i> in the NCBI GenBank database. This study investigates the taxonomic authenticity of those strains using DNA similarity indexes, i.e., average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH). All strains were compared with the type strain of <i>B. thuringiensis</i> ATCC 10972<sup>T</sup>. WGS-based phylotaxonomic investigations showed that out of 885 strains 803 strains authentically belonged to <i>B. thuringiensis</i> while 82 strains were mislabeled as <i>B. thuringiensis</i> having dDDH and ANI values less than the acceptable threshold of 70 and 95% respectively, for prokaryotic species definition in comparison with the <i>B. thuringiensis</i> type strain. Among these 82 mislabeled strains, 39 strains need to be reclassified within the <i>B. cereus</i> group in the species <i>B. anthracis</i> (33 strains), <i>Bacillus toyonensis</i> (five strains), and <i>Bacillus mycoides</i> (one strain). Furthermore, four strains were identified as <i>Bacillus tropicus</i> while one strain belonged to each of the species <i>Bacillus licheniformis</i>, <i>Bacillus paranthracis</i>, and <i>Bacillus weidmannii.</i> The remaining 36 strains did not match with any known <i>Bacillus</i> species nor the species of other bacterial genera, thus they could be assigned to hypothetical new species. Results of the present study, on the one hand, pave the way of comprehensive taxonomic refinements within <i>B. thuringiensis</i> species. On the other hand, highlight the role of taxonomic investigations in targeting authentic <i>B. thuringiensis</i> strains for biological control purposes.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 16
Isfahan University of Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR)
National Science Foundation, Iran National Science Foundation, University of Tehran
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Insect Resistance and Genetics
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.