Experimental evaluation of commercial quadruped robots: stability and performance in non-inertial environments

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the stability and performance of commercial quadrupedal robots, specifically the Ghost Robotics Vision 60 and Boston Dynamics Spot, under dynamic ground conditions typical of non-inertial naval environments. Our study systematically assesses these robots in controlled laboratory settings and real-world scenarios aboard the M80 Stiletto, a naval prototype vessel. To rigorously test the robots’ stability, balance, and path-following capabilities, we analyze primary metrics including the distance of the center of mass to the support polygon boundary, body-position tracking accuracy, trunk orientation steadiness, and joint torque profiles under dynamic disturbances from ground accelerations and rotations. The results reveal that while both robots demonstrate operational capabilities, significant challenges remain. Vision 60, in particular, exhibits superior stability, balance, and lower peak torque when handling substantial ground motions compared to Spot. However, both robots struggle with accurate body-position tracking under aggressive ground motions. These findings highlight the limitations of current commercial quadruped robots in operating within non-inertial environments and underscore the urgent requirement for further research and development in robot planning and control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00412-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evaluation of commercial quadruped robots: stability and performance in non-inertial environments

Ryan Donald, Yan Gu, Bowen Weng, Adam Norton et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications
Robotic Locomotion and Control
0.67
article

Experimental evaluation of commercial quadruped robots: stability and performance in non-inertial environments

Ryan Donald, Yan Gu, Bowen Weng, Adam Norton, J. Gregory Trafton, Brendan Hertel, Reza Azadeh, Stephen Misenti, Advait Prasad Jawaji, Magnus-Tryggvi Kosoko-Thoroddsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the stability and performance of commercial quadrupedal robots, specifically the Ghost Robotics Vision 60 and Boston Dynamics Spot, under dynamic ground conditions typical of non-inertial naval environments. Our study systematically assesses these robots in controlled laboratory settings and real-world scenarios aboard the M80 Stiletto, a naval prototype vessel. To rigorously test the robots’ stability, balance, and path-following capabilities, we analyze primary metrics including the distance of the center of mass to the support polygon boundary, body-position tracking accuracy, trunk orientation steadiness, and joint torque profiles under dynamic disturbances from ground accelerations and rotations. The results reveal that while both robots demonstrate operational capabilities, significant challenges remain. Vision 60, in particular, exhibits superior stability, balance, and lower peak torque when handling substantial ground motions compared to Spot. However, both robots struggle with accurate body-position tracking under aggressive ground motions. These findings highlight the limitations of current commercial quadruped robots in operating within non-inertial environments and underscore the urgent requirement for further research and development in robot planning and control.

International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and ApplicationsVol. 9(3)
United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), Iowa State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.