Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities
To ensure this contribution to identifying research priorities is reliable, scoping reviews must be performed following the existing rigorous methodological processes and adhere to the currently available reporting guidelines. By doing so, scoping reviews have great potential to identify research priorities, to guide the expansion of research and the generation of new knowledge.
Authors
- M D J Peters
- Hanan Khalil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-2009)
- Catrin Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-2191)
- Érica Brandão de Moraes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-158X)
- Danielle Pollock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-0609)
- Christina Godfrey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-3237)
- Zachary Munn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-5842)
- Andrea C. Tricco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-8971)
- Romy Menghao Jia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-8708)
- Lyndsay Alexander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-9150)
- A Asran
Institutions
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Campbell Collaboration (IN)
- Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
- Robert Gordon University (GB)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Published
- 2025-02-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111712
- Citations
- 23
- Primary Topic
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 96.63
Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council