Comparison of Aluminum Alloy and Copper Friction Stir Burnishing Tools Combined with Direct Energy Deposition Arc Process on Microstructure and Microhardness of 316L Stainless Steel

The direct energy deposition arc process is widely used for fabricating medium and large components with moderate geometric complexity but often results in coarse microstructures and inconsistent hardness. This study introduces a hybrid manufacturing approach combining the friction stir burnishing process with the direct energy deposition arc by a gas–metal arc welding technique to refine the microstructure and enhance the microhardness of components fabricated from austenitic stainless steel 316L. Our former study used an aluminum alloy (A5052) friction stir burnishing tool, demonstrating significant microhardness improvement and grain refinement. However, it also faced notable challenges under high-heat and -friction conditions, including the effect of material adherence to the workpiece during processing. Therefore, this study introduces a newly developed friction stir burnishing tool made from copper (C1100) and compares its performance with the aluminum alloy tool regarding microhardness enhancement and microstructure refinement. The results indicate that the specimen processed by direct energy deposition arc combined with the copper friction stir burnishing tool demonstrated the best overall performance in grain refinement and hardness enhancement. Specifically, it achieved the highest average microhardness of 250 HV at 50 µm depths, compared to 240 HV for the aluminum alloy tool. The statistical analysis showed that both tools led to significant improvements over specimens processed without them. The statistical analysis confirmed a notable reduction in secondary dendrite arm spacing across all depths, with the copper tool demonstrating the most refinement. Additionally, a preliminary investigation of corrosion behavior revealed tool-dependent differences. Overall, this study offers a promising approach to improving additive manufacturing, particularly for industries with less stringent surface finish requirements. It could potentially reduce post-processing time and cost. Future research should explore different process parameters and assess long-term corrosion performance to develop this hybrid technique further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9020053
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Aluminum Alloy and Copper Friction Stir Burnishing Tools Combined with Direct Energy Deposition Arc Process on Microstructure and Microhardness of 316L Stainless Steel

Junichi H. Kaneko, Takeyuki Abe, Teerayut Cordkaew
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Comparison of Aluminum Alloy and Copper Friction Stir Burnishing Tools Combined with Direct Energy Deposition Arc Process on Microstructure and Microhardness of 316L Stainless Steel

Junichi H. Kaneko, Takeyuki Abe, Teerayut Cordkaew
article en

Abstract

The direct energy deposition arc process is widely used for fabricating medium and large components with moderate geometric complexity but often results in coarse microstructures and inconsistent hardness. This study introduces a hybrid manufacturing approach combining the friction stir burnishing process with the direct energy deposition arc by a gas–metal arc welding technique to refine the microstructure and enhance the microhardness of components fabricated from austenitic stainless steel 316L. Our former study used an aluminum alloy (A5052) friction stir burnishing tool, demonstrating significant microhardness improvement and grain refinement. However, it also faced notable challenges under high-heat and -friction conditions, including the effect of material adherence to the workpiece during processing. Therefore, this study introduces a newly developed friction stir burnishing tool made from copper (C1100) and compares its performance with the aluminum alloy tool regarding microhardness enhancement and microstructure refinement. The results indicate that the specimen processed by direct energy deposition arc combined with the copper friction stir burnishing tool demonstrated the best overall performance in grain refinement and hardness enhancement. Specifically, it achieved the highest average microhardness of 250 HV at 50 µm depths, compared to 240 HV for the aluminum alloy tool. The statistical analysis showed that both tools led to significant improvements over specimens processed without them. The statistical analysis confirmed a notable reduction in secondary dendrite arm spacing across all depths, with the copper tool demonstrating the most refinement. Additionally, a preliminary investigation of corrosion behavior revealed tool-dependent differences. Overall, this study offers a promising approach to improving additive manufacturing, particularly for industries with less stringent surface finish requirements. It could potentially reduce post-processing time and cost. Future research should explore different process parameters and assess long-term corrosion performance to develop this hybrid technique further.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 9(2)
Saitama University (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.