Health care provider payment schemes and their changes since 2010 across nine Central and Eastern European countries – a comparative analysis

Health care provider payment schemes consist of a complex set of arrangements used to influence provider behavior towards specific health policy objectives. The study aimed at: 1) providing a structured, comparative overview of current payment schemes within the public health system in selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries for different health care providers; 2) identifying and comparing major changes in payment schemes since 2010. Methods included: 1) data collection form development; 2) desk research; 3) national experts' consultations; 4) comparative analysis. The results indicate that the nine CEE countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, and Romania) show numerous similarities in provider payment method mix and in the general direction of the recent changes conducted in this field. Output-based payment methods prevail across all countries and types of providers. Primary health care (PHC) providers are characterized by the most diverse payment method mix. PHC and hospital inpatient care have experienced the most frequent changes in their payment schemes within the last 13 years. These focused mostly on modifying existing payment methods (e.g. detailing payment categories), and applying additional methods to pay for specific services or performance (e.g. fee-for-service, bonus payments). The objectives of conducted change were often similar, thus, there is high potential for a shared, cross-country learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105261
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health care provider payment schemes and their changes since 2010 across nine Central and Eastern European countries – a comparative analysis

Silvia Gabriela Scîntee, Tamás Palicz, Pavel Hroboň, Antoniya Dimova et al.
6 citations
Health Policy
Healthcare Policy and Management
18.79
article

Health care provider payment schemes and their changes since 2010 across nine Central and Eastern European countries – a comparative analysis

Silvia Gabriela Scîntee, Tamás Palicz, Pavel Hroboň, Antoniya Dimova, Lenka Šlegerová, Daiga Behmane, Katarzyna Dubas‐Jakóbczyk, Costase Ndayishimiye, Liubovė Murauskienė, Cristian Vlădescu, Triin Habicht, Marzena Tambor, Aleksandar Džakula, Péter Gaál, Barbora Erasti, Alina Dūdele
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Health care provider payment schemes consist of a complex set of arrangements used to influence provider behavior towards specific health policy objectives. The study aimed at: 1) providing a structured, comparative overview of current payment schemes within the public health system in selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries for different health care providers; 2) identifying and comparing major changes in payment schemes since 2010. Methods included: 1) data collection form development; 2) desk research; 3) national experts' consultations; 4) comparative analysis. The results indicate that the nine CEE countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, and Romania) show numerous similarities in provider payment method mix and in the general direction of the recent changes conducted in this field. Output-based payment methods prevail across all countries and types of providers. Primary health care (PHC) providers are characterized by the most diverse payment method mix. PHC and hospital inpatient care have experienced the most frequent changes in their payment schemes within the last 13 years. These focused mostly on modifying existing payment methods (e.g. detailing payment categories), and applying additional methods to pay for specific services or performance (e.g. fee-for-service, bonus payments). The objectives of conducted change were often similar, thus, there is high potential for a shared, cross-country learning.

Health PolicyVol. 153
Titu Maiorescu University (RO), Semmelweis University (HU), Jagiellonian University (PL), World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK), Medical University of Varna (BG), Vilnius University (LT), University of Zagreb (HR), Charles University (CZ), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Advance (Japan) (JP), National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development (RO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Healthcare Policy and Management
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.