Mechanical and biological evaluation of β-dicalcium silicate/dicalcium phosphate-based cements: promising materials for biomedical applications
This study explores the synthesis and evaluation of β-Dicalcium silicate and Dicalcium phosphate-based cements for biomedical use. β-Tricalcium phosphate was synthesized using microwave-assisted wet precipitation, while β-Dicalcium silicate was prepared via the sol-gel method. Composites with varying β-Dicalcium silicate contents (20%, 30%, 40%) were formulated and characterized using X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and Field emission scanning electron microscope analyses. The 40% β-Dicalcium silicate composite showed the highest compressive strength at 10.22 MPa. Antibacterial tests against Staphylococcus aureus revealed that gentamicin-loaded Dicalcium phosphate cement had superior properties. Cytotoxicity studies using the Osteogenic sarcoma cell line revealed that the β-Dicalcium Silicate /Dicalcium Phosphate composites supported better cell viability compared to pure Dicalcium phosphate cement, with the 20% β-Dicalcium silicate /Dicalcium phosphate composition being the most effective in promoting cell growth. These findings suggest that β-Dicalcium silicate /Dicalcium phosphate composites hold promise for biomedical applications.
Authors
- Almataz Bellah Marandi
- Ali Deniz Dalgıç (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-1204)
- Ali Motameni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-9890)
- Ammar Z. Alshemary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-1869)
- Zafer Evis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-8162)
- Daver Ali
- Tuğba Köse
Institutions
- Istanbul Bilgi University (TR)
- Karabük University (TR)
- Middle East Technical University (TR)
- Wenzhou-Kean University (CN)
- Kean University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Taibah University for Science
- Published
- 2025-02-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2025.2461817
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.58